Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 22;41:219–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.01.009

Table 2.

Performance comparison of the hybrid models with different combinations of protein descriptors.

Core structure (Encoding) DNN (Feature) ACC (%) F-value (%) Recall (%) PRE (%) MCC
AAC 88.8 88.2 87.1 89.5 0.776
TC 87.6 87.5 88.7 86.5 0.754
PSSM 87.5 86.8 85.9 88.0 0.751
DC 88.2 87.9 88.8 87.3 0.766
CTD 89.5 89.0 89.0 89.2 0.791
TC_CTD 88.6 88.3 89.0 87.8 0.772
DC_TC 88.6 88.4 89.5 87.4 0.772
DC_PSSM 88.4 87.8 87.6 88.3 0.769
DC_CTD 88.0 87.4 87.3 87.8 0.761
CTD_PSSM 87.0 86.8 87.5 86.2 0.740
AAC_TC 86.6 86.1 86.2 86.0 0.732
TC_PSSM 87.6 87.5 89.6 85.6 0.753
AAC_CTD 87.5 87.4 88.1 87.1 0.752
AAC_DC 88.4 88.1 88.6 87.7 0.767
AAC_PSSM 88.0 88.1 88.6 87.6 0.760
CNN-RNN AAC_TC_PSSM 88.8 88.2 89.1 87.5 0.777
(Dictionary) AAC_TC_CTD 88.6 87.9 87.7 88.4 0.771
TC_CTD_PSSM 88.4 88.1 88.2 88.2 0.768
AAC_CTD_PSSM 87.7 87.2 87.0 87.7 0.754
AAC_DC_TC 89.2 89.0 90.3 87.9 0.785
AAC_DC_PSSM 88.1 87.4 86.6 88.4 0.761
DC_CTD_PSSM 88.0 87.9 89.4 86.7 0.760
AAC_DC_CTD 89.1 89.1 90.4 87.8 0.783
DC_TC_CTD 90.0 89.6 89.0 90.5 0.800
DC_TC_PSSM 89.1 89.0 88.7 89.4 0.782
AAC_DC_TC_PSSM 89.0 89.1 90.2 88.2 0.780
AAC_DC_TC_CTD 87.9 87.6 89.6 85.8 0.760
AAC_TC_CTD_PSSM 89.0 88.5 90.6 86.7 0.780
DC_TC_CTD_PSSM 89.4 89.4 91.3 87.6 0.789
AAC_DC_CTD_PSSM 88.9 88.7 90.4 87.3 0.780
AAC_DC_TC_CTD_PSSM 88.5 88.4 89.1 87.8 0.771