Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 1;53:101711. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101711

Table 2.

Risk of bias/quality assessment.

First author (publication year) Bias due to confounding Bias in selection of participants into the study Bias in classification of exposures Bias due to departures from intended exposures Bias due to missing data Bias in measurement of outcomes Bias in selection of the reported result Study-level RoB judgement
Bijnsdorp (2022)37 Moderate Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Moderate
Cameron (2008)41 Serious Low Serious Serious Low Moderate Low Serious
Chesley (2006)42 Serious Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Serious Serious
Choi (2006)40 Serious Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Moderate
Ferrerira (2017)43 Serious Low Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low Serious
Hajek (2018)38 Moderate Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Moderate
Heger (2017)44 Moderate Low Moderate Low Serious Moderate Low Serious
Hirst (2005)45 Moderate Moderate Moderate Low Serious Moderate Low Serious
Lacey (2019)39 Moderate Low Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low Moderate
Mohanty (2019)46 Serious Low Moderate Low Moderate Moderate Low Serious
Oshio (2018)47 Moderate Low Serious Low Low Moderate Low Serious
Stratmann (2021)48 Serious Serious Moderate Serious Serious Low Low Serious
Turgeman-Lupo (2020)49 Moderate Serious Moderate Low Low Moderate Low Serious
Item-level judgement Moderate Low Moderate Low Low Moderate Low