Table 5.
Use of causal wording by study design, type of exposures examined, and whether the first author affiliation was from a country in which English is an official language.
| Number of studies in which causal language was used | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract objectives/hypotheses | Title/abstract (other than objectives/hypotheses) | Objectives/hypotheses in main text |
Main text other than objectives/
hypotheses |
|
| Observational study design | ||||
| Cross-sectional (N = 117) | 5 | 37 | 11 | 89 |
| Cohort (N = 63) | 8 | 31 | 17 | 58 |
| Case-control (N = 19) | 3 | 11 | 9 | 17 |
| Nested case control (N = 1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| First author affiliation from a country with English as an official language | ||||
| Yes (N = 82) | 6 | 36 | 21 | 82 |
| No (N = 118) | 10 | 43 | 16 | 95 |
| Type of exposure variables | ||||
| Intervention only (N = 3) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Time-varying only (N = 12) | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Time-invariant only (N = 6) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Intervention and time-varying (N = 27) | 7 | 14 | 7 | 25 |
| Intervention and time—invariant (N = 11) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| Time-varying and invariant (N = 37) | 2 | 10 | 6 | 24 |
| All three types (N = 104) | 4 | 43 | 18 | 95 |