Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;2:891553. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.891553

TABLE 2.

Binding affinity predictions. Every missense mutation of the two poses was evaluated with mCSM-PPI2; results were compared with experimental outcomes.

Mutated residue Experimental data binding Distance to interface mCSM-PPI2 prediction Affinity Matching experimental vs. bioinformatics
Pose 1 Pose 2 Pose 1 Pose 2 Pose 1 Pose 2 Pose 1 Pose 2
E100R Increase 6,571 3,215 0,131 −1,225 Increase Decrease Y N
E242A Decrease 5,402 4,288 −0,45 −0,646 Decrease Decrease Y Y
D249A Increase 5,084 3,259 −0,6 −1,311 Decrease Decrease N N
L256Q Decrease 1,67 2,403 −0,003 −0,035 Decrease Decrease Y Y
F238T Decrease 9,45 7,537 −0,804 −0,714 Decrease Decrease Y Y
C104S Decrease 6,855 5,392 −0,39 −0,26 Decrease Decrease Y Y
D249R Decrease 5,084 3,259 −0,405 −0,738 Decrease Decrease Y Y
F248T Decrease 7,269 7,23 −0,366 −0,236 Decrease Decrease Y Y
C136S Decrease 6,305 6,262 −0,335 −0,32 Decrease Decrease Y Y
H236A Decrease 9,904 9,649 0,028 −0,063 Increase Decrease N Y