Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 2;8(2):e002726. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002726

Table 5.

Hepatotoxicity and reactivation of hepatitis C in patients treated with DMARDs or immunosuppressants

Author-year/country Patients (N) Concurrent antivirals* (%) Disease Treatment Increase in LFTs
N (%)
Increase in viral load
N (%)
RoB
Iannone et al164 2014/Italy† 29 0% RA Etanercept or MTX or combination 0 (0) 0 (0) Some concerns
Burton et al165 2017/USA 748‡ 4.6% RA DMARDs 37 (3.4) 0 (0) 7
Chen et al166 2015/Taiwan 26§ NS SLE Immunosuppressants 10 (38.5)¶ 10 (38.5)¶ 6
Costa et al160 2014/Italy 15 NS PsA TNFi 0 (0) 0 (0) 6
Parke et al161 2004/USA 5 0% RA TNFi 0 (0) 1 (20)** 6
Peterson et al162 2003/USA 24 0% RA Etanercept or Infliximab 0 (0) 6/22 (27.3)†† 6
Gandhi et al163 2017/USA 14‡‡ 14.3% RA, PsA Etanercept 7 (50.0) 5/10 (50.0) 5

*Patients concurrently treated with antivirals.

†Randomised controled trial.

‡1097 treatment-episodes.

§Anti-HCV+, baseline RNA not stated.

¶Increase in viral load or LFTs.

**Was not combined with liver injury.

††No significant differences were seen between the mean viral loads at baseline and follow-up.

‡‡5/7 were RNA-positive.

DMARDs, disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IMID, immune-mediated diseases; LFTs, liver function tests; MTX, methotrexate; NS, not significant; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RoB, risk of bias.