Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 7.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Jan 8;68(3):e28884. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28884

TABLE 4:

App acceptability ratings post-intervention (App group reporting on app)

Item Endorsementa Mean (SD)
App Acceptability
Would recommend to other survivorsb 86.0% 3.9 (1.1)
Increased awareness of ways to be more healthy 83.0% 3.7 (1.1)
Improved knowledge of health 81.7% 3.6 (1.2)
Perceived obtained more knowledge than others 78.9% 3.5 (1.3)
Would continue app use in futureb 78.0% 3.4 (1.2)
Ease of app use 77.1% 3.4 (1.3)
Related to my own experiences 72.3% 3.2 (1.2)
Provided new information not discussed with providers 71.3% 3.4 (1.3)
Felt like others had similar experiences 69.5% 3.2 (1.3)
Positive impact on quality of life 68.8% 3.1 (1.3)
Helped achieve health goal 62.4% 3.0 (1.3)
Perceived better physical health than others 57.6% 2.9 (1.4)
Perceived better emotional health others 55.4% 2.9 (1 4)
Improved emotional health 51.1% 2.6 (1.3)
Improved physical health 50.0% 2.6 (1.3)
Felt connected to others 47.4% 2.6 (1.4)
Improved social life 25.5% 1.9 (1.2)
Information in app made feel overwhelmed/scared 21.3% 1.8 (1.3)
Acceptability Specific to Messages in App
Messages easy to understand 90.3% 4.2 (1.0)
Satisfied with message content variety 87.9% 3.7 (1.0)
Easy to access messages 78.5% 3.8 (1.3)
Easy to make time to read messages 76.3% 3.6 (1.3)
Messages were useful 75.3% 3.4 (1.2)
Links/resources in messages helpful/interesting 74.2% 3.3 (1.0)
Looked forward to messages 55.9% 2.8 (1.3)
Acceptability Specific to Applets in App
Applets helpful/interesting 34.7% 2.1 (1.2)
a

Endorsement represents agreeing “somewhat” (3, 50%) through “completely” (5, 100%)

b

scale was from “definitely not” (1) to “definitely yes” (5), endorsement represents at least maybe (3)