Table 2.
Author | 1a | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sandal et al. [41] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
Antúnez et al. [45] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
Turner et al. [44] | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5 |
Cherkin et al. [46] | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
Criteria: (1) Eligibility criteria specified; (2) Subjects randomly allocated to groups; (3) Concealed allocation; (4) Groups were similar at baseline; (5) Blinding of all subjects; (6) Blinding of all therapists; (7) Blinding of all assessors; (8) Measures obtained from more than 85% of subjects allocated to groups; (9) Subjects received treatment or control condition as allocated, or intention-to-treat analysis; (10) Between-group statistical comparisons reported for at least one outcome; (11) Both point measures and measures of variability were reported. High, high risk of bias; low, low risk of bias. aThis item relates to external validity and therefore does not contribute to the total score.