Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 1;73(727):e115–e123. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0104

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants

Characteristic All participants (n= 303) Interview participants (n = 25)


GP–led (n= 141) Surgeon-led (n= 162) GP-led (n= 17)a Surgeon-led (n= 8)
Sociodemographic
Age, years, mean (SD) 67.9 (8.3) 68.2 (8.4) 67.1 (8.4) 59.5 (6.7)
Sex, male, n (%) 98 (70) 105 (65) 14 (82) 4 (50)
Living situation, with a partner, n (%) 107 (76) 120 (74) 16 (94) 8 (100)
Educational attainment, n (%)
  Primary or none 14 (10) 13 (8) 1 (6) NA
  Secondary 28 (20) 40 (25) 2 (12) 2 (25)
  Vocational education 75 (53) 71 (44) 10 (59) 4 (50)
  University 12 (9) 24 (15) 3 (18) 2 (25)
  Missing 12 (9) 14 (9) 1 (6) NA
Randomised to Oncokompas, n (%) 68 (48) 83 (51) 10 (59) 3 (38)

Clinical and pathological
Comorbidities, n (%)
  0–1 63 (45) 84 (52) 12 (71) 5 (63)
  ≥2 78 (55) 78 (48) 5 (29) 3 (38)
Cancer diagnosis via, n (%)
  Population screening 74 (52) 78 (48) 10 (59) 4 (50)
  Clinical course 67 (48) 84 (52) 7 (41) 4 (50)
Tumour stage, n (%)
  I 59 (42) 54 (33) 4 (24) 3 (38)
  II 50 (35) 54 (33) 5 (29) 2 (25)
  III 32 (23) 54 (33) 8 (47) 3 (38)
Stoma, n (%) 6 (4) 7 (4) 3 (18) NA
Chemotherapy, n (%) 27 (19) 41 (25) 7 (41) 3 (38)
Time since surgery at moment of NA NA 4.3 (3.6–5.1) 5.0 (4.3–5.8)
interview, years, median (IQR)
a

During follow-up six patients transferred from the GP back to the surgeon. IQR = interquartile range. NA = not applicable.