Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;27:74. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_235_21

Supplementary Table 2.

Quality assessment of cross-sectional studies based on the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist

Studies Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Score
Proudfoot A.T.[9] Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 6/8
Delirrad M.[29] Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes 5/8
Kavousi-Gharbi S.[4] Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes 6/8

Q1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?; Q2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?; Q3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?; Q4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?; Q5. Were confounding factors identified?; Q6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?; Q7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?; Q8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?