Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 3;71(6):432–440. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000620

TABLE 4.

Generalized Structural Equation Modeling of Nurse Staffing and Missed Nursing Care on Exclusive Breast Milk Feeding (EBMF) Rate at the Hospital Level (N = 158 Hospitals)

Effects Coefficient 95% CI p
Nurse staffing → Missed nursing care overall → EBMF rate
 Total effect 0.136 [0.081, 0.190] <.001
 Direct effect 0.123 [0.064, 0.183] <.001
 Indirect effect 0.012 [−0.008, 0.033] .236
Nurse staffing → Missed skin-to-skin mother–baby care after birth → EBMF rate
 Total effect 0.133 [0.080, 0.187] <.001
 Direct effect 0.098 [0.047, 0.148] <.001
 Indirect effect 0.035 [0.012, 0.059] .003
Nurse staffing → Missed breastfeeding within 1 hour after birth → EBMF rate
 Total effect 0.134 [0.081, 0.188] <.001
 Direct effect 0.106 [0.054, 0.157] <.001
 Indirect effect 0.029 [0.008, 0.051] .007
Nurse staffing → Missed recovery care → EBMF rate
 Total effect 0.138 [0.083, 0.193] <.001
 Direct effect 0.136 [0.079, 0.194] <.001
 Indirect effect 0.001 [−0.014, 0.017] .860

Note. Covariates were controlled in mediation models, including safety climate, annual birth volume, hospital ownership, obstetric level, neonatal intensive care hospital, mean years of experience as a labor nurse, and proportion of respondents with BSN degree or above. CI = confidence interval.