. 2022 Nov;15(11):1856–1866. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.07.015

Table 5.

Prevalence of Systolic Curling in Relation With Disjunction, Prolapse, or Billowing

		Outcome Variable	Fisher Test^a	Logistic Regression^b
Exposure Variable		Systolic Curling	P Value	Odds Ratio	P Value	Model
Disjunction present any site	Present	47/1,974 (2.4)	0.0067	3.6 (1.5-12.1)	0.0144	1. Curling by disjunction
Disjunction present any site	Absent	4/605 (0.7)	0.0067	3.6 (1.5-12.1)	0.0144	1. Curling by disjunction
Inferolateral	Present	24/134 (17.9)	1.36 x 10^-18	12.0 (5.9-24.5)	8.94 x 10^-12	2. Curling by disjunction (4 sites simultaneously)
Inferolateral	Absent	27/2,445 (1.1)	1.36 x 10^-18	12.0 (5.9-24.5)	8.94 x 10^-12
Inferior	Present	44/1,508 (2.9)	3.79 x 10^-5	2.7 (1.2-6.8)	0.0238
Inferior	Absent	7/1,028 (0.7)	3.79 x 10^-5	2.7 (1.2-6.8)	0.0238
Anterior	Present	32/1,405 (2.3)	0.3221	0.9 (0.5-1.7)	0.7671
Anterior	Absent	19/1,121 (1.7)	0.3221	0.9 (0.5-1.7)	0.7671
Anterolateral	Present	21/325 (6.5)	2.55 x 10^-7	1.2 (0.6-2.5)	0.6069
Anterolateral	Absent	30/2,233 (1.3)	2.55 x 10^-7	1.2 (0.6-2.5)	0.6069
Prolapse	Present	30/76 (39.5)	1.45 x 10^-35	71.9 (37.1-143.0)	9.48 x 10^-36	3. Curling by prolapse
Prolapse	Absent	21/2,503 (0.8)	1.45 x 10^-35	71.9 (37.1-143.0)	9.48 x 10^-36	3. Curling by prolapse
Prolapse of mural leaflet	Present	28/70 (40.0)	4.05 x 10^-33	69.7 (35.5-140.1)	4.27 x 10^-34	4. Curling by mural leaflet prolapse
Prolapse of mural leaflet	Absent	23/2,509 (0.9)	4.05 x 10^-33	69.7 (35.5-140.1)	4.27 x 10^-34	4. Curling by mural leaflet prolapse

Values are n/N (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Fisher exact test for independence between 2 categorical variables. In each case, this is between systolic curling (present/absent) and the exposure variable listed (present/absent).

There are 4 logistic models represented, each with systolic curling as the outcome (present/absent), and the exposure variables as listed. Logistic models are adjusted by age, sex, arterial hypertension, and body mass index.