Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 9;407(7):2651–2662. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02637-y

Table 3.

Studies included in the systematic review, their characteristics, and reported results

Study Country Number of living/deceased donor transplants Mean/median age of patients, yr (SD)/[range] Mean/median time to PDC removal, mo (SD)/[range] Prevalence of peritonitis in the “in situ” group, % (n/N) Prevalence of catheter-related infections in the “in situ” group, % (n/N) Prevalence of catheter-related infections in the control group, % (n/N) Successful use of the pretransplant PDC when dialysis was needed, % (n/N)
Adult patients
Kwong et al. [11] Canada 33/77 53.1 (13)a N/A 1.1 (1/92) N/A 0 80 (12/15)
Warren et al. [27] Canada/UK N/A N/A N/A 8.5 (10/118) 10.2 (12/118) 0 80 (12/15)b
Maiorca et al. [32] Italy 0/34 39 (10) 17 (8) d 3.3 (1/30) N/A 0 100 (6/6)
O'Donoghue et al. [33] UK 0/241 Mean of 37.1 [0–371] 3.8 (9/234) 6.4 (15/234) 14.3 (1/7) N/A
Pediatric patients
Arbeiter et al. [34] Austria 2/29 Mean of 6.8 [115] Median of 3 11.1 (3/27) 18.5 (5/27) 0 N/A
Andreetta et al. [31] Italy 9/71 Mean of 9.3 [1.7–21] Mean of 80.3 [0–216] d 0c 0c 0c 100d (12/12)
Malagon and Hogg [30] USA Experimental group: 0/13; control group: 13/0 9 (4.2) [115] Mean of 3.8 weeks [10 days–5 weeks] 7.7 (1/13) 15.4 (2/13) 7.7 (1/13) N/A
Schärer and Fine [54] Various countriese N/A All < 15 22 [2–113] d 9.4 (9/96) N/A N/A N/A

Abbreviations: N/A, not available; PDC, peritoneal dialysis catheters; SD, standard deviation

aCalculated also for patients not receiving PD but reported in the study

bFive patients developed peritonitis, 3 others needed the conversion to hemodialysis due to dialysate-derived fluid leaks

cSix patients were lost to follow-up and their data were not provided — concern about the presence of bias due to missing data. Furthermore, 1 peritonitis case due to sepsis was not classified as catheter-related

dAdditionally, 2 children restarted peritoneal dialysis at 4 and 12 months after surgery. Their pretransplant catheters were successfully used

eIt was a questionnaire-based cooperative study involving respondents from the USA, Germany, Denmark, Canada, France, Israel, Finland, Switzerland, UK, Japan, Sweden, and the Netherlands