Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 7;13:6717. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34305-6

Fig. 4. Performance evaluation for regression when the underlying model is known.

Fig. 4

a Mean absolute error (MAE) and b expected normalised calibration error (ENCE)82 achieved by the Multi-SWAG models trained on only one model, plotted for different trajectory lengths T by averaging over 5 × 104 (FBM, SBM) or 4 × 104 (ATTM, LW, CTRW) test trajectories each. The ENCE characterises the mean difference between predicted and observed errors. As was the case for the unknown ground truth model (Fig. 3), we can achieve a small calibration error below 3%. The MAE shows the expected results with regards to the histograms in Fig. 5.