Table 1.
Comparison of the proposed and MPM methods.
| Example | Kumar-Branner | Flat-top | |
|---|---|---|---|
| t (s) | Proposed Method | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| MPM | 7.3e−3 | 7.0e−3 | |
| MSE | Proposed Method | 0.0010 | 0.0066 |
| MPM | 0.0018 | 0.0198 | |
| MS/λ | Proposed Method | 0.84 | 0.7 |
| MPM | 0.79 | 0.6 | |
Comparison of the proposed and MPM methods.
| Example | Kumar-Branner | Flat-top | |
|---|---|---|---|
| t (s) | Proposed Method | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| MPM | 7.3e−3 | 7.0e−3 | |
| MSE | Proposed Method | 0.0010 | 0.0066 |
| MPM | 0.0018 | 0.0198 | |
| MS/λ | Proposed Method | 0.84 | 0.7 |
| MPM | 0.79 | 0.6 | |