Table 2.
Study | Age group | Country | Loneliness measure | Time period | Loneliness trend | Effect size for mean-level change across the entire time period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Buecker et al. (2021)54 | Emerging adults (18–29 years old) | Studies from all continents, but mostly from the USA | Different versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale163,164 | 1976–2019 |
Significant increase in loneliness only in North American samples, not in European or Asian samples (possibly owing to lack of statistical power). No significant differences in historical changes in loneliness between North American and European and Asian samples. Values have been relatively stable since 2012. |
d = 0.56 |
Clark et al. (2015)52 | High-school students (Study 1) | USA | Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale164 | 1978–2009 | Loneliness declined | d = –0.26 |
College students (Study 2) | USA | Six items with five response options | 1991–2012 | Loneliness declined | d = –0.11 | |
Xin & Xin (2016)53 | College students | China | Chinese version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3)163,165 | 2002–2011 | Loneliness increased | d = 0.39 |
Yan et al. (2014)55 | >60 years old | China | Chinese version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3)163,165 | 1995–2011 | Loneliness increased | d = 1.02 |