Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 7;2(1):9–23. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00124-1

Table 2.

Summary of cross-temporal meta-analyses on historical changes in loneliness levels

Study Age group Country Loneliness measure Time period Loneliness trend Effect size for mean-level change across the entire time period
Buecker et al. (2021)54 Emerging adults (18–29 years old) Studies from all continents, but mostly from the USA Different versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale163,164 1976–2019

Significant increase in loneliness only in North American samples, not in European or Asian samples (possibly owing to lack of statistical power).

No significant differences in historical changes in loneliness between North American and European and Asian samples. Values have been relatively stable since 2012.

d = 0.56
Clark et al. (2015)52 High-school students (Study 1) USA Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale164 1978–2009 Loneliness declined d = –0.26
College students (Study 2) USA Six items with five response options 1991–2012 Loneliness declined d = –0.11
Xin & Xin (2016)53 College students China Chinese version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3)163,165 2002–2011 Loneliness increased d = 0.39
Yan et al. (2014)55 >60 years old China Chinese version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3)163,165 1995–2011 Loneliness increased d = 1.02