Table 1.
Study and cohort information.
Author, country, year | Study goal | Study population (diagnosis) | Sample size Gender (males %) | Region of body studied |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bowness et al., 2021 (18) | Assess the AI anatomy identification | Healthy population | 244 | Interscalene-supraclavicular level brachial plexus block Rectus sheath block Axillary level brachial plexus Erector spinae plane block Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block Adductor canal block Popliteal level sciatic nerve block |
Alkhatib et al., 2018, France (9) |
To study nerve structure and ultrasound images tracking | – | 10 6 (60%) males 4 (40%) females | Median nerve identification |
Alkhatib et al., 2019, France (10) |
To study the deep-learning performance for nerve tracking in ultrasound images | - | 42 | Median & sciatic nerves |
Gungor et al., 2021 (11) | To study the accuracy of real-time (AI) -based anatomical identification | Healthy population | 40 20 (50%) males 20 (50%) females | Block regions: Supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) |
Hetherington et al., 2017 (19) | Detect the lower vertebral level | – | 20 | Anesthesia in the lower vertebrae regions (sacrum, intervertebral gaps, and vertebral bones) |
Huang et al., 2019 China (20) |
femoral nerve on ultrasound images | – | – | Femoral nerve |
Mwikirize et al., 2018 (12) | CNN-based framework for needle detection in curvilinear 2D US | bovine/porcine lumbosacral spine phantom |
– | |
Oh et al., 2019, Singapore (13) |
Success rate of spinal anesthesia | Obstetric women | 100 | Spinal anesthesia |
Pesteie et al., 2017 (14) | Precise needle target localization | – | 33 | – |
Smistad et al., 2018, Norway (15) |
Identification of musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, and radial nerve) and blood vessels | Healthy volunteers | 49 | Axillary nerve block: four nerves (musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, and radial nerve) and blood vessels |
Tran et al., 2010, Canada (21) |
Features of the lumbar anatomy | Parturients in labor or scheduled for cesarean delivery | 20 | Epidural anesthesia |
Bowness et al., 2022 (16) | Assessment of the utility of ScanNav to identify structures, teaching and learning UGRA and increase operator confidence. Assessment of UGRA expert perception of risks of the use of ScanNav (risk of block failure, unwanted needle trauma (eg, arteries, nerves, and pleura/peritoneum | Healthy volunteers | 2 | Nine peripheral nerve block regions The upper limb (the “interscalene-,” “upper trunk-,” “supraclavicular-,” “axillary-level brachial plexus” regions; “Erector spinae plane block,” “rectus sheath plane block regions”; the “suprainguinal level fascia iliaca plane,” “adductor canal and popliteal-level sciatic nerve blocks.” |
Bowness et al., 2022 (22) | Expert-level AI model performance evaluation | Healthy adult subjects | 40 | Upper-extremity blocks: “upper trunk of the brachial plexus,” “interscalene-level brachial plexus,” “supraclavicular-level brachial plexus,” “axillary-level brachial plexus” |
Thoraco-abdominal blocks: erector spinae plane, rectus sheath block. Lower-extremity blocks: “suprainguinal fascia iliaca,” “adductor canal and distal femoral triangle,” “popliteal-level sciatic nerve blocks.” |
||||
Yang et al., 2022 (23) | Development a deep learning algorithm to locate the “interscalene brachial plexus” based on ultrasound images to aid anaesthesiologists. | Patients | 1076 (dataset −11 392 images | Interscalene brachial plexus |
Liu et al., 2021 (17) | To identify difference in accuracy between deep learning-powered ultrasound guidance and regular ultrasound images; the use of artificial intelligence to optimize regional anesthesia puncture path; to identify the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided imaging “scapular nerve block” surgical pain of the fracture | Patients | 100 | “Scapular nerve block” |