Table 2.
Artificial intelligence method and its purpose.
| Study citation, first author | Machine learning model | Purpose of ML | Benefits | Risks and limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bowness et al. (18) | ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block system (Intelligent Ultrasound Ltd [IUL], Cardiff, UK) - deep convolutional neural networks based on the U-Net architecture | To identify anatomical regions | Identifying the specific anatomical structures, correct ultrasound view to anesthetists and standardization of clinical procedure | Model-related: Recognizes only anatomical structures on images |
| Alkhatib et al. (9) | Adaptive Median Binary Pattern approach Joint Adaptive Median Binary Pattern approach Three tracking algorithms: particles filter, Mean Shift and Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi (KLT) techniques | To imrove tracking procedure | Automatic detection and tracking of nerve structure, ROIs | Model-related: Nerve appearance might be similar to surroundings Difficulties in real-time tracking Risk of error after many iterations |
| Alkhatib et al. (10) | Deep learning methods: C-COT, ECO, CNT, MDNet SANet, SiameFC, CFNet, DCFNet, MCPF, HDT, HCFT CREST, DLT, PF-AMBP | Median and the sciatic nerves | Good performance Overcoming noise difficulties No need for pre-filtering images |
Model-related: Nerve appearance might be similar to surroundings Failure of retracing the nerve |
| Gungor et al. (11) | Nerveblox, Smart Alfa Teknoloji San | Identify anatomical structures | A real-time interpretation of anatomic structures | Model-related: Low accuracy in pediatric/geriatric patients |
| Hetherington et al. (19) | SLIDE (Spine Level IDEntification) System based on deep convolutional neural network | transverse spinal ultrasound planes classification | Successful detection of vertebral regions at real-time speed | Model-related: Failure in identifying the difference between gap and bone images Real-time speed considerations |
| Huang et al. (20) | Deep learning model: U-Net | identify femoral nerve | Fast training and forecasting of the method Real-time segmentation |
Study-related: Small sample size Limited number of images No data augmentation |
| Mwikirize et al. (12) | Deep learning (DL) based on convolution neural networks (CNNs) | Evaluate the new method | 2D US data; deep convolution neural network usage detection data and intensity invariant feature maps | Model-related: Cannot systematically find the needle Relying on an expert sonographer |
| Oh et al. (13) | to detect the inter-spinous images | Localize L3/4 | Confirm the sonographic images and structures. Time saving method Less possible complications |
Study-related: Lack of a comparator arm Highly specific algorithm. The system is validated by current study population Absence of complex spinal anatomy, obesity, pediatric and geriatric patients. The risk of misinterpretation of fusion or reduced interspinous distance |
| Pesteie et al. (14) | CNN-based machine learning technique | Evaluate the convolutional network architecture | Few outliers in detecting the needles Performance is better compared with others |
Model-related: Not running in real time |
| Smistad et al. (15) | Deep convolutional neural network – U-Net | Identify musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, and radial nerves and blood vessels |
Accurate detection of blood vessels, median and ulnar nerves Real-time identification Direct comparison of 4 methods |
Study-related: Small sample size Low precision and recall values Poor identification of musculocutaneous, radial nerves |
| Tran et al. (21) | MATLAB algorithm | Detect the LF depth | Helps to find the epidural space and measure the skin-to-LF depth An implementation in a wide range of ultrasound machines. |
Model-related: Insignificant errors and failures to detect the LF mean Poor image quality might result in unsatisfactory outcomes |
| Bowness et al. (16) | ML/DL | Identification of the anatomical structures | Potential to support non-experts in training /clinical practice, as well as experts in teaching UGRA. It may promote the uptake and spread of UGRA. | Model-related: Experts reported an increase in risk |
| Bowness et al. (22) | DL (based on U-Net architecture) | Identification of the anatomical structures; highlighting anatomical structures of interest |
High TP/TN and low FP/FN rates in key anatomical structure identification | Model-related: UGRA itself has not reduced the incidence of nerve injury; Study-related: remote expert were not present when the subjects were scanned. |
| Yang et al. (23) | DL | The developed model located the “interscalene brachial plexus” more accurately compared to nonexperts. | ||
| Liu et al. (17) | DL, SegNet Model | to optimize regional anesthesia puncture path; | DL ultrasound guided imaging for scapular nerve block in scapular fracture surgery was more efficient, significantly shortened the time of performing nerve block and reduced complications compared to traditional method. |
ML, machine learning; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, Negative predictive value; AUC-area under the curve; FP-false-positive; FN-false-negative.