Table 3.
Contrast employed to analyze recollection in each study included in the review, listed in chronological order.
| Daselaar et al. (2006) | A quasi- exponential function based on old responses with confident rate 4 vs. old responses with confident rates 1, 2 or 3 |
| Dennis et al. (2008) | Subsequent definitely old responses vs. subsequent likely old and new responses |
| St Jacques et al. (2009) | Negative pictures subsequently remembered minus subsequently forgotten vs. neutral pictures subsequently remembered minus forgotten |
| Tsukiura et al. (2011) | Hits during the retrieval of names and job titles vs. misses |
| Dew et al. (2012) | Context cue trials without memory test vs. correct context trials |
| Matthäus et al. (2012) | Block design: Time series recorded during episodic memory demands |
| St Jacques et al. (2012) | Modulatory inputs: 50% more episodic richness than semantic details from verbally retrieved memories from the scanner session within two days later |
| Waring et al. (2013) | Subsequently remembering item and background vs. subsequently remembering item, for positive and negative scene valences |
| Fandakova et al. (2015) | Correct rejection of rearranged pairs vs. correct rejection of novel pairs |
| Grady et al. (2015) | Incorrect and I do not know answers vs. correct answers |
| Legon et al. (2016) | Modulatory inputs: F-contrast over detail and context orientation conditions at encoding |
| Cansino et al. (2017) | Modulatory inputs: subsequent recollection vs. subsequent unsuccessful recollection; recollection vs. unsuccessful recollection |
| King et al. (2018) | Hits for intact pairs vs. rearranged pairs judged as intact (false alarms) |
| Monge et al. (2018) | High confident hits for source memory |
| Ankudowich et al. (2019) | Orthogonal polynomial contrasts for encoding and retrieval: Retrieval accuracy vs. right PFC vs. left hippocampus |
| Stark et al. (2020) | Time series across the entire scan, independent of task condition |
| Varangis et al. (2021) | Time series concatenated from the three episodic memory task |
| Deng et al. (2021) | High memory based on memory detail rates 3 and 4; low memory based on memory detail rates 1 and 2 |
| Tsuruha and Tsukiura (2021) | Hit source for same age group; Hit source for different age group |
| Ness et al. (2022) | Subsequent durable memories (6 days after) vs. subsequent transient memories (20 min after) |
PFC, prefrontal cortex.