. 2022 Oct 31;8(11):e11320. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11320

Table 1.

The Published Data Set for the Various Channel Networks.

Source	Basin	R_B	R_L	R_A	d_L	d_N	d_w	d_s	D	${\hat{h}}_{p}$	${\hat{t}}_{p}$	β_G	n	$\hat{k}$	${\hat{t}}_{L}$	nβ_G
Morisawa (1962)	Tar Hollow	4.13	3.55	5.26	1.53	1.12	3.23	1.06	1.71	0.63	0.86	0.54	2.98	0.43	1.27	1.61
	Home Creek	2.90	2.17	3.36	1.28	1.37	3.04	1.16	1.76	0.51	1.09	0.56	3.10	0.52	1.60	1.72
	Mill Creek	4.67	2.66	4.75	1.26	1.58	3.23	1.22	1.98	0.55	1.08	0.60	3.48	0.44	1.53	2.10
	Green Lick	4.41	3.32	5.12	1.47	1.24	3.29	1.11	1.82	0.61	0.92	0.57	3.18	0.42	1.35	1.81
	Beech Creek	3.80	2.61	4.05	1.37	1.39	3.28	1.16	1.91	0.55	1.06	0.59	3.35	0.46	1.52	1.97
	Piney Creek	4.12	2.64	4.83	1.23	1.46	3.03	1.19	1.80	0.55	1.00	0.56	3.11	0.47	1.47	1.74
	Casselman River	3.75	2.24	4.42	1.09	1.64	2.86	1.24	1.78	0.51	1.07	0.55	3.06	0.51	1.57	1.69
	Emory River	3.82	1.92	4.25	0.90^*	2.05^*	2.75	1.35	1.85	0.48	1.17	0.57	3.17	0.54	1.71	1.79
	Youghiogheny River	4.57	2.24	5.33	0.96^*	1.88	2.78	1.31	1.82	0.51	1.07	0.55	3.09	0.51	1.58	1.71
	Daddy's Creek	4.13	2.18	4.71	1.01	1.82	2.84	1.29	1.83	0.51	1.10	0.56	3.14	0.51	1.61	1.76
	Little Mahoning Creek	4.07	2.80	4.85	1.30	1.36	3.08	1.15	1.78	0.57	0.97	0.55	3.08	0.46	1.43	1.71
	Allegheny River	4.47	2.37	5.23	1.04	1.74	2.85	1.27	1.81	0.53	1.05	0.56	3.09	0.50	1.54	1.72
Marani et al. (1991)	Hacking River	4.81	2.97	5.35	1.30	1.44	3.17	1.18	1.87	0.58	0.99	0.58	3.27	0.44	1.43	1.89
	Beech Creek	3.69	2.61	4.05	1.37	1.36	3.24	1.15	1.87	0.55	1.05	0.58	3.27	0.46	1.51	1.89
	Vermillon River	3.11	2.07	2.80	1.41	1.56	3.62	1.22	2.20^*	0.50	1.27	0.64	3.76	0.47	1.76	2.39
	Kaskaska River	3.76	2.63	4.35	1.32	1.37	3.12	1.16	1.80	0.55	1.01	0.56	3.14	0.47	1.48	1.77
	Sagamon River	3.13	1.82	3.29	1.01	1.91	2.92	1.31	1.92	0.47	1.23	0.58	3.30	0.54	1.77	1.92
	Daddy's Creek	4.10	2.18	4.71	1.01	1.81	2.83	1.29	1.82	0.51	1.09	0.56	3.12	0.51	1.60	1.74
	Davison River	3.96	2.41	4.80	1.12	1.56	2.88	1.22	1.75	0.53	1.02	0.55	3.01	0.50	1.52	1.64
	Querecual	4.20	1.75	4.50	0.74^*	2.56^*	2.65	1.44	1.91	0.46	1.23	0.57	3.24	0.55	1.79	1.86
	Ilice Creek	2.70	2.00	5.10	0.85^*	1.43	2.07	1.18	1.22	0.49	0.86	0.42	2.10	0.68	1.43	0.89
	Virginio Creek	3.90	2.30	4.50	1.11	1.63	2.92	1.24	1.81	0.52	1.07	0.56	3.12	0.50	1.57	1.74
	Bisenzio	4.10	2.30	4.60	1.09	1.69	2.94	1.26	1.85	0.52	1.08	0.57	3.19	0.50	1.58	1.81
	Elsa	4.40	1.80	4.20	0.82^*	2.52^*	2.88	1.43	2.06^*	0.47	1.30	0.61	3.55	0.52	1.84	2.18
	Sieve	4.90	2.50	4.60	1.20	1.73	3.28	1.27	2.08^*	0.54	1.16	0.63	3.69	0.44	1.61	2.32
Rosso et al. (1991)	Rio Gallina	3.04	2.03	3.92	1.04	1.57	2.66	1.22	1.63	0.49	1.05	0.52	2.84	0.56	1.60	1.48
	Maroggia	3.51	2.02	4.07	1.00	1.79	2.79	1.28	1.79	0.49	1.12	0.55	3.08	0.54	1.65	1.71
	Petrace	4.10	2.10	4.50	0.99^*	1.90	2.86	1.31	1.88	0.50	1.14	0.57	3.22	0.51	1.65	1.84
	Arno	4.70	2.50	5.20	1.11	1.69	2.99	1.26	1.88	0.54	1.06	0.57	3.24	0.47	1.53	1.86
	Big	3.24	2.52	4.60	1.21	1.27	2.75	1.12	1.54	0.54	0.92	0.50	2.67	0.53	1.42	1.34
	Big Piney	4.25	3.01	6.32	1.20	1.31	2.76	1.14	1.57	0.58	0.84	0.49	2.61	0.50	1.30	1.28
	Blackwater	3.31	1.85	4.20	0.86^*	1.95	2.53	1.32	1.67	0.47	1.10	0.52	2.85	0.58	1.67	1.50
	Bourbeuse	4.12	3.34	6.47	1.29	1.17	2.81	1.08	1.52	0.61	0.78	0.48	2.52	0.49	1.23	1.21
	Gasconade	4.18	3.11	5.83	1.29	1.26	2.91	1.12	1.62	0.59	0.86	0.51	2.75	0.48	1.31	1.40
	Lamine	2.98	1.90	4.08	0.91^*	1.70	2.47	1.26	1.55	0.48	1.04	0.50	2.69	0.60	1.61	1.36
	Meramec	3.19	2.18	4.08	1.11	1.49	2.76	1.20	1.65	0.51	1.03	0.53	2.87	0.54	1.55	1.51
	Moreau	3.46	2.98	5.58	1.27	1.14	2.71	1.06	1.44	0.58	0.80	0.47	2.45	0.52	1.28	1.15

Anomalous Values of Fractal Dimensions.