Table 2.
Ref. | Year | Antibody Peptidea | Internal Standardb | Reported Sensitivity | Additional Method Aspectsc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[11] | 2008 | Polyclonal (rabbit) anti-VIF | tSIL Peptide | LOD: 2.6 ng/mL | |
[18] | 2012 | Polyclonal (chicken) anti-VIF | tSIL Peptide | LOD: 0.3 ng/mL, LLOQ: 0.4 ng/mL | |
[19] | 2013 | Polyclonal anti-VIF | cSIL Peptide | LLOQ: 0.5 ng/mL | Protein Precipitation |
[15] | 2020 | Monoclonal anti-FSP d | cSIL Peptide | LOD: 0.0057 ng/mL LLOQ: 0.02 ng/mL |
Micro-flow chromatography |
Current method | Monoclonal anti-FSP d | tSIL Peptide | LLOQ: 0.15 ng/mL | Mobile Phase DMSO |
Tg tryptic peptides: VIF, VIFDANAPVAVR; FSP, FSPDDSAGASALLR.
Reported assays all employ multi-point external calibration, but may differ by internal standard approach, utilizing either tryptic stabile isotope labeled (tSIL) or cleavable/“winged” stable isotope labeled (cSIL) peptide.
All methods use protein digestion and peptide IAE. The method in Ref. 19 also uses an initial protein precipitation step.
Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) antibody against FSPDDSAGASALLR sequence peptide.