Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 8;14:77. doi: 10.1186/s13321-022-00647-y

Table 4.

Prediction results on isolated ChEMBL assays

Assay ChEMBL ID N compounds N active N inactive Accuracy TN FP FN TP TNR FPR FNR TPR
PC3
 CHEMBL4155048 [43] 33 33 0 0.94 0 0 2 31 0.06 0.94
 CHEMBL1840268 [44] 34 28 6 0.71 1 5 5 23 0.17 0.83 0.18 0.82
 CHEMBL3097567 [45] 38 0 38 0.63 24 14 0 0 0.63 0.37
 CHEMBL2040207 [46] 44 31 13 0.41 9 4 22 9 0.69 0.31 0.71 0.29
 CHEMBL3062059 [47] 47 24 23 0.77 20 3 8 16 0.87 0.13 0.33 0.67
 CHEMBL3788954 [48] 64 23 41 0.63 33 8 16 7 0.80 0.20 0.70 0.30
DU145
 CHEMBL4686002 [49] 30 0 30 0.90 27 3 0 0 0.90 0.10
 CHEMBL4158478 [50] 38 26 12 0.69 6 6 6 20 0.50 0.50 0.23 0.77
 CHEMBL2406593 [51] 50 0 50 0.28 14 36 0 0 0.28 0.72

RF classifiers (GAP 20, PCC = 95) results on the external test set consisting of the compounds from a single ChEMBL assay for PC3 and DU145. Reference articles of each assay are added in brackets