Table 6.
Post-intervention changes in cycling and motorized transport (Edinburgh and London sites, all n = 35).
|
Pre-intervention
(mean ±SD) |
Post-intervention
(mean ±SD) |
Change
(mean ±SD) |
p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cycling (rides/week) | 1.2 ± 2.5 | 4.2 ± 4.1 | 3.0 ± 4.6 | < 0.001 |
| (min/week) | 12.7 ± 31.4 | 55.9 ± 92.6 | 43.1 ± 100.9 | 0.02 |
| Utility cycling* (days/week) | 0.4 ± 0.9 | 1.1 ± 1.4 | 0.8 ± 1.6 | < 0.001 |
| Commuting cycling (rides**/week) | 0.6 ± 1.4 | 1.7 ± 2.7 | 1.1 ± 3.0 | 0.04 |
| Leisure cycling (rides/week) | 0.2 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 1.2 ± 1.6 | < 0.001 |
| Motorized transport use (min/week) | 405 ± 464 | 255 ± 180 | 150 ± 442 | 0.05 |
| Participants reporting increased rides per week for different types of cycling, and overall, post-intervention ( n , %) | ||||
| Overall | 22 (62.9) | |||
| Utility* | 14 (40.0) | |||
| Commuting | 11 (31.4) | |||
| Leisure | 20 (57.1) | |||
*Utility cycling includes shopping, running errands, school run, etc.
**Commuting rides are defined as one way of a return journey.
Bold values represent statistical significance (p < 0.05).