Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 3;25(4):350–359. doi: 10.1007/s10047-022-01317-4

Table 4.

Significance of team approach and effects of team learning

Survey subjects Question Average score 95% CI Effective response rate (%)
Significance of team approach
 Phases 1–4, 41 persons Was team building significant to the program overall? 4.78 4.60, 4.96 100
Effects of team learning
 Phases 2–4, 31 persons Did mentoring and support by a specialist and faculties make team approach more effective? 4.48 4.19, 4.78 100
Did your own attitude and speech change as a result of mentoring and support? 4.12 3.87, 4.39 100
Was your team more effective as a result of mentoring and support? 4.00 3.67, 4.33 100