Table 1.
Use of EBRT in definitive management of primary penile squamous cell carcinoma.
| Study | Pts, n | RT dose, Gy | Median follow-up, month | 5-year LC, % | 5-year CSS, % | 5-year penile preservation, % | Stenosis or necrosis rate | Tumor characteristic | Tumor location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLean et al., 1993 [22] | 26 | 35 Gy/10 fx; 60 Gy/25 fx |
116 | 61 | 69 | 66 |
|
|
|
| Sarin et al., 1997 [29] | 59 | 60 Gy/30 fx | 62 | 55 | 66 | 50 |
|
|
|
| Gotsadze et al., 2000 [25] | 155 | 40–60 Gy | 40 | 65 | 86 | 65 |
|
|
|
| Zouhair et al., 2001 [27] | 23 | 45–74 Gy/25–37 fx | 12 | 41 | NR | 36 |
|
|
|
| Azrif et al., 2006 [24] | 41 | 50.0–52.5 Gy/16 fx | 41 | 62 | 96 | 62 |
|
|
|
| Ozsahin et al., 2006 [23] | 21 | 52 Gy | 62 | 49 | NR | 52 |
|
|
|
| Mistry et al., 2007 [26] | 18 | 55 Gy/16 fx−50 Gy/20fx | 62 | 63 | NR | 62 | • 10% necrosis; 5% stenosis |
|
|
CSS, cancer-specific survival; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; Pts, patients; RT, radiotherapy; LC, local control; NR, not reported.