Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 9;9(4):389–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.010

Table 3.

Select studies evaluating adjuvant EBRT ± chemotherapy to the groin or pelvis.

Study Treatment years Patient, n LND, n EBRT, n Age, median (IQR), year Median follow-up, month Chemotherapy, n or % Adjuvant EBRT target
Demkow, 1999 [75] 1989–1994 64 35 12 64 (21–86) 33.0 NACT: 2;
CCRT: 3
NR
Zouhair et al., 2001 [27] 1962–1994 41 5 14 59 (35–75) 70.0 No ILN
Chen et al., 2004 [108] 1989–2000 45 19 9 64 (29–87) 37.0 CT: 1 Primary/bilateral ILN and lower iliac LN
Langsenlehner et al., 2008 [52] 1987–2006 24 8 Penis/surgical stump (n=14); ILN (n=8) 62.7 (35.5–90.4) 58.4 No Penis/stump/ILN & iliac nodes
Franks et al., 2011 [77] 2002–2008 23 14 14 58 (40–81) 27.0 No Bilateral ILN and PLN
Graafland et al., 2011 [73] 1988–2007 161 161 67 64 (33–91) 60.0 NACT: 4 Ipsilateral ILN ± PLN
Tang et al., 2017 [84] 1980–2013 92 92 40 65.3 (53–70) 9.3 Perioperative CT: 27 Bilateral PLN
Winters et al., 2018 [68] 1998–2012 589 589 136 61.8 (NR) NR Perioperative CT: 169 ILN + PLN
Johnstone et al., 2019 [85] Multi-institutional (NR) 93 93 58 65.3 (36–90) 9.4 Perioperative CT: 46 ILN ± PLN (ipsilateral if involved)
Ager et al., 2021 [87] 2002–2017 146 146 121 59 (54–70) 10.6 CCRT: 41% Ipsilateral ILN ± pelvic LN
Choo et al., 2020 [89] 1995–2015 23 23 11 57 (43–68) 15.8 CCRT: 11 Bilateral ILN & PLN
Li et al., 2021 [91] 2003–2015 93 93 32 49 (NR) 8.8 CCRT: 34% NR
Jaipuria et al., 2020 [90] 2011–2017 45 45 31 56 (45–67) 12.5 CCRT: 6 Bilateral ILN and PLN + suprapubic region
Yuan et al., 2020 [123] 1999–2016 51 47 19 61 (37–91) 36.6 CCRT: 17;
CT alone: 20
PLN (n=15);
ILN (n=13)
Mittal et al., 2021 [78] 2014–2017 14 14 14 NR 24.0 CT: 14 Bilateral ILN ± PLN
Khurud et al., 2022 [88] 2010–2018 128 128 78 57 (50–65) 22.0 CT alone: 19%;
CCRT: 13%;
CT into EBRT: 24%;
CT into CCRT: 12%
Variable: involved ILN and PLN (68%); involved & uninvolved ILN + PLN (32%)
Study EBRT indication EBRT technique EBRT dose to LN 5-yr CSS 5-yr OS 5-yr LRC EBRT-related toxicity Misc data
Demkow, 1999 [75] ≥2 ILNs or ENE NR NR NR NR (3-yr: 76%) NR NR LR: 11% (entire cohort)
Zouhair et al. , 2001 [27] (+) surgical margins or lymph node involvement Parallel opposed AP/PA fields (18 MV); e-field boost for positive nodes 36–66 Gy/20–36 fx NR 57% 48% NR pN2: 7%; pN3: 1%
Chen et al. , 2004 [108] pN+ Parallel opposed AP/PA field 40–70 Gy/20–35 fx NR 54.30% NR (3-yr: 89% [AIRT group]) Grade 3 lymphedema: 22% (AIRT); radionecrosis of inguinal region: 11% (AIRT group) pN+ (n=17)
Langsenlehner et al., 2008 [52] (+) surgical margins and pN+ Parallel opposed AP/PA fields; e-field boost for positive nodes 45–60 Gy/25–60 fx 84.30% 56.60% 100% with AIRT 10% with persistent lymphedema Of 12 patients with cN+, definitive EBRT to ILN resulted in 5-yr regional control of 92%
Franks et al., 2011 [77] pN2/3 or ENE Parallel opposed AP/PA fields; e-field boost for positive nodes Phase I: 45 Gy/20 fx;Phase II: 12 Gy/5 fx (boost if needed) NR NR (3-yr: 66%) NR (3-yr: 56%) Scrotal/penile/lower leg lymphedema: 6 Locoregional relapse-free survival: 56%
Graafland et al., 2011 [73] ≥2 ILNs or ENE NR 50 Gy/25 fx NR NR NR NR 5-yr ILN recurrence: 16%
Tang et al., 2017 [84] pN3 NR 50 Gy/25 fx (n=27);<40 Gy (n=4);>50 Gy (n=5) 14.4 months 12.2 months Adjuvant EBRT with better median time to recurrence (7.7 vs. 5.3 months) NR Median PLN+ (n=2);ENE+ in PLN (n=39)
Winters et al., 2018 [68] NR NR 75% received ≥45 Gy NR 64% NR NR pN2 (n=433)
Johnstone et al., 2019 [85] ≥2 ILNs or ENE NR 50 Gy in 25 fx NR Median OS: 10.6 months NR NR Median ILN+ (n=4), 72% ENE; median PLN+ (n=2), 49% ENE; median DSS: 11 months
Ager et al., 2021 [87] pN3 NR Variable:
45 Gy/20 fx;
54 Gy/27 fx;
50–54 Gy/25–27 fx
51% 44% 56% NR ENE: 99% (ILN: 74%; PLN: 25%);
5-yr RFS: 51%; in-field recurrence: 47%
Choo et al., 2020 [89] Regional LN+ NR 45 Gy/25 fx (uninvolved LN);
56 Gy/28 fx (involved LN)
NR (2-yr: 49.3%) NR (2-yr: 25%) NR (2-yr: 27%) Lymphedema: 46%; necrosis: 9% pN3: 43%
Li et al., 2021 [91] pN3 Parallel opposed AP/PA fields (equally weighted) 30–68 Gy/15–34 fx NR (3-yr CSS: 28.5% [CCRT] vs. 16.2% [CT]) NR NR NR 21% CCRT underwent salvage surgery
Jaipuria et al., 2020 [90] ≥2 ILNs ± PLN ± ENE IMRT/VMAT 45 Gy/25 fx (pelvis);
54 Gy (ENE+ region);
57–60 Gy (gross residual)
NR Mean OS: 3.9 yr (RT);
mean OS: 2.8 yr (Chemo);
median OS not met in PLN-cohort
NR 39% of RT group with persistent lymphedema; no RT-related necrosis Pelvic LN+ (n=13);
ENE: 78%
Yuan et al., 2020 [123] NR NR 39.6–54 Gy/22–30 fx (PLN);
42.5–64.8 Gy (ILN)
NR NR 2-yr: 54% G2 skin: 18% (acute);
G2 GI; 12% (acute);
G1 lymphedema: 18% (late)
N2/3 (n=23);
ENE+: 12%
Mittal et al., 2021 [78] pN3 IMRT 50 Gy/25 fx NR NR (2-yr: 79%) NR (2-yr: 79%) G2 lymphedema: 29%;
G3 lymphedema: 0%
93% received adjuvant and CCRT
Khurud et al., 2022 [88] pN3 Conventional (54%);
3DCRT (26%);
IMRT (20%);
45 Gy/25 fx;
50.4 Gy/28 fx;
50 Gy/25 fx
NR NR (2-yr: 62%) NR (2-yr: 83% [multi-modal]) 45% of AIRT group with lymphedema 2-yr DFS: 55%

EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; NR, not reported; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival; Misc, miscellaneous; ILN, inguinal lymph nodes; ENE, extranodal extension; PLN, pelvic lymph node; NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy; CT, chemotherapy; LND, lymph node dissection; LN, lymph node; LRC, local regional control; AP, anterior posterior; PA, posterior anterior; DSS, disease specific survival; DFS, disease free survival; RFS, relapse free survival; VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy; RT, radiotherapy; DCRT, definitive chemoradiotherapy; yr, year; Chemo, chemotherapy; AIRT, adjuvant inguinal lymph node EBRT; IQR, interquartile range; fx, fractions.