Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 23;127(10):1816–1826. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01954-9

Table 5.

Histologically verified high-grade lesionsa among long-term non-attenders by intervention arm.

Control, n (%) Opt-in, n (%) Send-to-all, n (%)
Clin-sample Self-sample Clin-sample Total Self-sample Clin-sample Total
Invited 1892 1897 1878
Screened 90 (4.8) 250 (13.2) 73 (3.8) 323 (17.0) 445 (23.7) 75 (4.0) 520 (27.7)
Had histology resultb 3 (0.2) 15 (0.8) 5 (0.3) 20 (1.1) 32 (1.7) 6 (0.3) 38 (2.0)
Had histology resultc 3 (3.3) 15 (6.0) 5 (6.8) 20 (6.2) 32 (7.2) 6 (8.0) 38 (7.3)
CIN2 + detectedb 1 (0.1) 9 (0.5) 3 (0.2) 12 (0.6) 17 (0.9) 3 (0.2) 20 (1.1)
CIN2 + detectedc 1 (1.1) 9 (3.6) 3 (4.1) 12 (3.7) 17 (3.8) 3 (4.0) 20 (3.8)
CIN3 + detectedb 1 (0.1) 7 (0.4) 3 (0.2) 10 (0.5) 17 (0.9) 3 (0.2) 20 (1.1)
CIN3 + detectedc 1 (1.1) 7 (2.8) 3 (4.1) 10 (3.1) 17 (3.8) 3 (4.0) 20 (3.8)
Cervical cancer detected 0 (0.0) 3 (1.2) 1 (1.4) 4 (1.2) 6 (1.3) 1 (1.3) 7 (1.3)

aCIN2, CIN3, ACIS or cancer.

bPer cent of women invited.

cPer cent of women screened.