Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 23;127(10):1816–1826. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01954-9

Table 6.

Histologically verified high-grade lesions (n, % of total) among screening test positivea women by mode of follow-up.

Women screened by self-sampling and triaged by gynaecologistb Women screened by self-sampling and triaged by GPc Women screened by clinician (any arm) or triaged outside studyd
Total positive 16/18 positivee Other HR positivef Total positive 16/18 positivee Other HR positivef Total positiveg 16/18 positivee Other HR positivef Cytology positiveh
Total 31 (100.0) 14 (100.0) 17 (100.0) 32 (100.0) 9 (100.0) 23 (100.0) 34 (100.0) 13 (100.0) 17 (100.0) 2 (100.0)
Had histology resulti 26 (83.9) 14 (100.0) 12 (70.6) 13 (40.6) 5 (55.6) 8 (34.8) 21 (61.8) 10 (76.9) 7 (41.2) 2 (100.0)
CIN2 + detectedj 10 (32.3) 9 (64.3) 1 (5.9) 11 (34.4) 5 (55.6) 6 (26.1) 12 (35.3) 9 (69.2) 1 (5.9) 2 (100.0)
CIN3 + detectedk 9 (29.0) 8 (57.1) 1 (5.9) 10 (31.3) 5 (55.6) 5 (21.7) 12 (35.3) 9 (69.2) 1 (5.9) 2 (100.0)
Cervical cancer detected 4 (12.9) 4 (28.6) 0 (0.0) 4 (12.5) 3 (33.3) 1 (4.3) 3 (8.8) 3 (23.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

aPositive HPV test, or ASCUS + for cytology.

bWomen from any self-sampling arm who were allocated to and attended gynaecologist triage.

cWomen from any self-sampling arm who were allocated to and attended GP triage.

dWomen from any intervention arm who were screened by a clinician, and women from any self-sampling arm who self-sampled but attended triage outside the study.

ePositive for HPV16 and/or 18, and may be positive for other high-risk HPV types.

fPositive for any of the high-risk HPV types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 or 68, but not positive for 16/18.

gTwo women were registered as hrHPV-positive, but lacked information on hrHPV-type.

hDid not have HPV screening test.

iRegistered with a histology diagnosis in the CervicalScreen Norway/CRN databases.

jCIN2, CIN3, ACIS or cancer.

kCIN3, ACIS or cancer.