Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 8;22:474. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02932-y

Table 4.

Correlation between magnitude of increase in Lp(a) levels and MACE

Crude model Adjusted model I Adjusted model II
HR (95%CI) p HR (95%CI) p HR (95%CI) p
Reference category (n = 181) ≤ 0 mg/dL 1 1 1
1st quartile (n = 90) > 0-2 mg/dL 1.57 (0.90–2.71) 0.111 1.72 (0.98–3.02) 0.058 1.63 (0.94–2.83) 0.084
2nd quartile (n = 64) > 2–4.1 mg/dL 1.59 (0.87–2.92) 0.134 1.65 (0.90–3.02) 0.109 1.56 (0.85–2.86) 0.151
3rd quartile (n = 77) > 4.1–10.1 mg/dL 0.78 (0.38–1.59) 0.488 0.78 (0.38–1.59) 0.485 0.73 (0.35–1.49) 0.381
4th quartile (n = 76) > 10.1 mg/dL 2.29 (1.36–3.84) 0.002 2.00 (1.18–3.42) 0.011 1.78 (0.97–3.28) 0.062

Reference category: patients with an increase in Lp(a)

1st quartile: patients with an increase in Lp(a) level > 0-2 mg/dL

2nd quartile: > 2–4.1 mg/dL. 3rd quartile: > 4.1–10.1 mg/dL.4th quartile: > 10.1 mg/dL

Adjusted model I: adjusted for baseline Lp(a) levels

Adjusted model II:adjusted for on-statin Lp(a) levels