Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 8;21:237. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01679-2

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of included RCTs

Study Year/country Study Intervention group Control group Design Age, y NYHA III-IV, % All-cause mortality Cardiovascular mortality Heart failure hospitalization Worsening heart failure events Follow-up
Aronow WS 1997 USA Open-label Propranolol (n = 79) Placebo (n = 79) LVEF ≥ 40%, > 62 years age 81 ± 8 vs. 81 ± 7 47 vs. 49 44/79 vs. 60/797 / / / 35 months
Yusuf, S 2003 Canada Double-blind Candesartan (n = 1514) Placebo (n = 1509) CHARM preserved trial, LVEF ≥ 40%

67.2 ± 11.1 vs

67.1 ± 11.1

38.5 vs. 40 / 170/1514 vs. 170/1509 241/1514vs.276/1509 / 36.6 months
Zi M 2003 UK Double-blind Quinapril (n = 36) Placebo (n = 38) LVEF ≥ 40%, > 62 years age 77 ± 7 vs. 78 ± 7 16.7 vs. 26.3 1/36 vs. 1/38 1/36 vs. 1/38 2/36 vs. 5/38 0/36 vs. 4/38 6 months
Cleland, JG 2006 UK Double-blind perindopril (n = 424) Placebo (n = 426) PEP-CHF, LVEF ≥ 40%, > 70 years age 75 (72,79) vs. 75 (72,79) 23 vs. 26 17/424 vs. 19 /4267 10/424 vs. 17/426 34/424 vs. 53 /426 59/424 vs. 71/426 12 months
Ahmed, A 2006 USA Open-label Digoxin (n = 492) Placebo (n = 496) LVEF ≥ 45%, > 45 years age 66.7 ± 10.7 vs. 66.9 ± 9.9 21.5 vs. 22.6 115/492 vs. 116/496 81/492 vs. 81/496 61/492 vs. 73/496 89/492 vs. 108/496 37 months
Massie,BM 2008 USA Single-blind Irbesartan (n = 2067) Placebo (n = 2061) PRESERVE, LVEF ≥ 45%, > 60 years age 72 ± 7 vs. 72 ± 7 80 vs. 79 445/2067 vs. 436 /2061 311/2067 vs. 302 /2061 325/2067 vs. 336 /2061 291/2067 vs. 314 /2061 49.5 months
Yip, GW 2008 Hong Kong Open-label Irbesartan (n = 53) vs. Ramipril (n = 39) Placebo (n = 47) HK-PROBE, LVEF ≥ 45%, > 18 years age 75 ± 8.5 vs. 74 ± 6.1 vs. 73 ± 8.4 30.4 vs. 33.3 vs. 28.0 1/53 vs. 0/39 vs. 3/47 1/53 vs. 0/39 vs. 1/47 6/53 vs. 5/39 vs. 6/47 / 12 months
Solomon,SD 2012 USA Double-blind Sacubitril–valsartan (n = 149) Valsartan (n = 152) PARAMOUNT, LVEF ≥ 45%, > 18 years age 70.9 ± 9.4 vs. 71.2 ± 8.9 19 vs. 21 1/149 vs. 2/152 1/149 vs. 2/152 / 9/149 vs. 12/152 36 weeks
Edelmann, F 2013 Austria Double-blind Spironolactone (n = 213) Placebo (n = 209) Aldo-DHF, LVEF ≥ 50%, > 18 years age 67 ± 8 vs. 67 ± 8 15 vs. 12 1/213 vs. 0/209 1/213 vs. 0/2091 21/213 vs. 15/209 / 12 months
Yamamoto,K 2013 Japan Open-label Carvedilol (n = 120) Placebo (n = 125) DHF, LVEF > 40%, > 20 years age 73 ± 10 vs. 71 ± 11 15 vs. 8 18/120 vs. 21/1257 8/120 vs. 7/1255 21/120 vs. 27/125 25/120 vs. 31/125 24 months
Pitt, B 2014 USA Double-blind Spironolactone (n = 1722) Placebo (n = 1723) TOPCAT, LVEF ≥ 45%, > 18 years age 68.7 (61,76.4) vs. 68.7 (60.7,75.5) 33.4 vs. 32.6 252/1722 vs. 274/1723 160/1722 vs. 176/1723 206/1722 vs. 245/1723 / 3.3 years
Solomon, SD 2019 USA Single-blind Sacubitril–valsartan (n = 2407) Valsartan (n = 2389) PARAGON-HF, LVEF ≥ 45%, > 18 years age 72.7 ± 8.3 vs. 72.5 ± 8.5 19.3 vs. 20.3 342/2407 vs. 349/2389 204/2407 vs. 212/2389 690/2407 vs. 797/2389 202/2407 vs. 221/2389 4 years
Armstrong, PW 2020 Canada Open-label Vericiguat 15 mg (n = 264) vs. Vericiguat 10 mg (n = 262) Placebo (n = 262) VITALITY-HFpEF, LVEF ≥ 45%, > 45 years age 73.1 ± 9.1 vs. 72.2 ± 9.7 vs. 72.8 ± 9.4 42.4 vs. 41.4 vs. 40.5 10/264 vs. 15/262 vs. 7/262 8/264 vs. 12/262 vs. 4/262 / / 24 weeks
Anker SD 2021 Germany Double-blind Empagliflozin (n = 2997) Placebo (n = 2991) EMPEROR-Presersed LVEF ≥ 50% 71.8 ± 9.3 vs. 71.9 ± 9.6 422 vs. 427 219 vs.244 259 vs 352 362 vs 485 36 months
Solomon, SD 2022 USA Double-blind Dapagliflflozin (n = 3131) Placebo (n = 3132) DELIVER LVEF > 40% 71.8 ± 9.6 vs. 71.5 ± 9.5 26.1 vs. 23.4 497 vs 526 231 vs. 261 329 vs 418 368 vs. 455 2.95 years

HF heart failure, HFpEF heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction; “/” = no data available