Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 8;20:516. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03736-6

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

EWAS output comparisons across three models. Panel A. Model 1 adjusted for age and gender. Model 2 adjusted for age, gender, and HiTIMED-projected tumor purity. Model 3 adjusted for age, gender, HiTIMED-projected tumor purity, DC, CD8mem, Bmem, Treg, epithelial, endothelial, and stromal cell proportions. Delta betas larger than 0.3 and FDR smaller than 0.01 were used as the cut-off for statistically significant DMC identification. Panel B. Heatmap with Manhattan distance clustering and colon cancer CIMP subtypes colored were generated per model