Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 26;96(21):e01401-22. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01401-22

TABLE 2.

Expression of autophagy genes in BM-derived infected macrophages from transgenic and WT micea

Gene Fold change (mean ± SEM)
M1-γ34.5 M2-γ34.5 WT
Akt1e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Akt2 P > 0.05 P > 0.05 2.22 ± 0.54*f
Akt3e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Atg10e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Atg101e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Atg12d 1.26 ± 0.01 1.48 ± 0.03 1.51 ± 0.04
Atg13d 1.70 ± 0.10 1.76 ± 0.03 2.11 ± 0.14
Atg3d 1.64 ± 0.06 1.57 ± 0.02 1.37 ± 0.05
Atg4ad 1.18 ± 0.07 1.31 ± 0.02 1.2 ± 0.05
Atg4bd 1.58 ± 0.11 1.45 ± 0.05 1.41 ± 0.09
Atg5e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Atg7e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Atg9a 1.88 ± 0.17* 1.59 ± 0.06* P > 0.05
Badd 1.50 ± 0.11 1.64 ± 0.09 1.70 ± 0.14
BclIIe P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Bcl2l1d 1.81 ± 0.07 1.63 ± 0.08 1.57 ± 0.03
Becn1d 1.23 ± 0.03 1.55 ± 0.05 1.40 ± 0.01
Bnip3b −2.32 ± 0.09 −1.56 ± 0.10 −4.72 ± 1.9
Cflarc 7.22 ± 0.37 5.31 ± 0.38 4.06 ± 0.26
Ctsdd −1.89 ± 0.01 −1.68 ± 0.04 −1.66 ± 0.03
Ctsle P > 0.05 P > 0.05 2.06 ± 0.38*
Ddit4e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Eif2ak3d −1.32 ± 0.15 −1.50 ± 0.09 −1.50 ± 0.09
Ern1d 1.56 ± 0.05 1.66 ± 0.11 1.55 ± 0.12
Hif1a 2.72 ± 0.44* P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Hmgb1 −1.52 ± 0.07 −2.66 ± 0.6 −2.95 ± 0.67
Hrasd 1.34 ± 0.07 1.36 ± 0.04 1.38 ± 0.05
Krasd 1.85 ± 0.23 1.92 ± 0.19 2.20 ± 0.14
Lamp1d 1.07 ± 0.02 1.51 ± 0.03 1.28 ± 0.02
Lamp2d 1.39 ± 0.04 1.75 ± 0.03 1.69 ± 0.06
Map2k1d 1.91 ± 0.1 1.85 ± 0.09 1.63 ± 0.09
Map2k2d 2.01 ± 0.16 1.60 ± 0.17 1.58 ± 0.14
Map3k7e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Mapk1e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Mapk3d −1.31 ± 0.05 −1.38 ± 0.14 −1.26 ± 0.06
Mapk8e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Mapk9d 1.72 ± 0.03 1.89 ± 0.06 1.53 ± 0.04
Mtmr14 1.65 ± 0.09* P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Mtmr3 1.37 ± 0.08* P > 0.05 P > 0.05
mTOR 1.39 ± 0.18* P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Nrase P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Nrbf2 P > 0.05 1.29 ± 0.12* P > 0.05
Pik3c3e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Pik3cae P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Pik3cbe P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Pik3cd P > 0.05 P > 0.05 4.00 ± 1.13*
Pik3r2e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Pik3r3e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Pik3r4e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Prkcd 1.44 ± 0.05* 1.37 ± 0.09* P > 0.05
Prkcqe P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Ptene P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Raf1d 1.84 ± 0.08 1.76 ± 0.14 1.59 ± 0.13
Rb1cc1 P > 0.05 1.20 ± 0.05* P > 0.05
Rps6kb1d 1.30 ± 0.11 1.43 ± 0.03 1.38 ± 0.04
Rras2 P > 0.05 P > 0.05 −2.63 ± 0.51*
Stk11 1.25 ± 0.08* P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Traf6d 2.17 ± 0.06 1.94 ± 0.27 1.87 ± 0.21
Tsc2e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Ulk1e P > 0.05 P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Ulk2 −1.52 ± 0.11* P > 0.05 P > 0.05
Wipi1 −1.68 ± 0.13* −2.26 ± 0.83* P > 0.05
a

BM-derived macrophages from M1-γ34.5 and M2-γ34.5 transgenic mice and WT mice were infected with 10 PFU/cell of WT McKrae virus for 1 h at 37°C, washed with PBS, and incubated for an additional 24 h in fresh medium. Expression of 62 autophagy genes in infected cells was analyzed by NanoString, and the level of each gene was normalized to its level in mock-infected BM-derived macrophages. Results are shown as fold increase or decrease relative to mock-infected gene expression. Results indicate mean ± SEM (n = 3).

b

For Bnip3 gene expression, there were no differences between the WT and M1-γ34.5 groups (P > 0.05), while differences between WT and M2-γ34.5 groups and among WT, M1-γ34.5, and M2-γ34.5 were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

c

For Cflar gene expression, the three groups of infected macrophages were statistically significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).

d

The three groups of infected macrophages were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05), but they were significantly different from their mock-infected counterparts (P < 0.05).

e

M1-γ34.5, M2-γ34.5, and WT macrophages were not significantly different from each other or their mock-infected counterparts for AKT1, AKT3, AKT10, Atg101, Atg5, Atg7, BclII, Ddit4, Map3k7, Mapk1, Pik3c3, Pik3ca, Pik3cb, Pik3r2, Pik3r3, Pik3r4, Prkcq, Pten, Tsc2, and Ulk1 genes (P > 0.05).

f

Each gene indicated by an asterisk among the three groups of macrophages was similar to one another and significantly different from their counterparts without the asterisk.