TABLE 4.

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) findings.

Model	χ2	Df	p	CFI	TLI	SRMR	RMSEA (90% CI)
Three-factor model (Study 1–Student veterans w/wo disabilities)	348.97	132	<0.05	0.89	0.88	0.07	0.09 (0.08, 0.10)
Re-specified three-factor (Study 1–Student veterans w/wo disabilities)	289.27	130	<0.05	0.92	0.91	0.05	0.07 (0.06, 0.08)
Three-factor model (Study 2–Student veterans with disabilities)	228.59	132	<0.05	0.88	0.86	0.07	0.07 (0.05, 0.09)
Re-specified three-factor (Study 2–Student veterans with disabilities)	195.68	130	<0.05	0.92	0.90	0.06	0.06 (0.04, 0.08)
Three-factor model (Study 3–Student veterans with PTSD symptoms)	214.03	132	<0.05	0.85	0.82	0.07	0.05 (0.04, 0.06)
Re-specified three-factor (Study 3–Student veterans with PTSD symptoms)	179.61	129	<0.05	0.91	0.89	0.06	0.04 (0.02, 0.05)
Three-factor model (Study 4–Hispanic students with disabilities)	197.17	132	<0.05	0.88	0.86	0.08	0.07 (0.05, 0.09)
Re-specified three-factor (Study 4–Hispanic students with disabilities)	182.04	130	<0.05	0.91	0.89	0.07	0.06 (0.04, 0.09)

Df, degree of freedom; CFI, comparative fit index, TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; SRMR, standardized root mean residual, RMSEA, the root mean square error of approximation; w/wo, with and without.