Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;2015(6):CD001555. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001555.pub5

Summary of findings 3. Methotrexate compared to placebo for inclusion body myositis.

Methotrexate compared to placebo for inclusion body myositis
Patient or population: people with inclusion body myositis
 Settings:Intervention: methotrexate
 Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Placebo Methotrexate
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (%) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable 44 (1 study) See comment Data collected at 12 months only
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) ‐ MMT The mean change in muscle strength (%) in the control group was ‐2.0% The mean change in muscle strength (%) in the intervention group was
1.5% higher
(1.0 lower to 3.9 higher)
44 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 moderate1 MD in mean change based on intention‐to‐treat data. Per protocol: MD 1.6%, 95% CI ‐2.3 to 5.4. This study was assessed as having a low overall risk of bias.
Change in muscle mass at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%)
e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Significant adverse events 43 per 1000 381 per 1000 (52 to 1000) RR 8.76 (1.19 to 64.28) 44 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
moderate2
Badrising 2002: treatment group withdrawals = 8/21; placebo group withdrawals = 1/23
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; MMT: manual muscle testing; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Downgraded for imprecision. The single randomised controlled trial of methotrexate was insufficiently powered to exclude a possible benefit from methotrexate.

2 Downgraded for imprecision.