Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;2015(6):CD001555. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001555.pub5

Summary of findings 5. Methotrexate and azathioprine compared to methotrexate (plus leucovorin) for inclusion body myositis.

Methotrexate (MTX) and azathioprine (AZA) compared to MTX (plus leucovorin) for inclusion body myositis
Patient or population: people with inclusion body myositis
 Settings:Intervention: methotrexate and azathioprine (plus leucovorin)
 Comparison: methotrexate
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Methotrexate Methotrexate and azathioprine
Change in muscle strength at 6 months (%) Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable 11
 (1 study) See comment Categorical change in MMT only reported. This study was graded as having a high risk of bias.
Change in muscle strength at 12 months (%) (using MMT or QMT) at 12 months ‐ not measured
Change in muscle mass at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Change in handgrip strength at 6 months (%) ‐ not measured
Change in timed walk at 6 months (%)
e.g. 10‐metre or 6‐minute walk test at 6 months ‐ not measured
Significant adverse events Not estimable Not estimable Not estimable 11
 (1 study) See comment Leff 1993: Combined AZA and MTX = 3 withdrawals; MTX (plus leucovorin) = 0 withdrawals
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval; MMT: manual muscle testing; QMT: quantitative muscle testing
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.