TABLE IV.
Type of photomask | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Quartz photomask | High resolution (>= 1.0 μm) Very stable Low thermal expansion coefficient Easy to clean Non-restricted wavelength range (> 180 nm) | Could break Very expensive Time consuming |
Glass (soda lime) photomask | Cost-effective solution Stable Easy to clean High resolution (>= 2 μm) | Fragile Limited wavelength range (> 350 nm) Time consuming |
Plastic photomask | Cheapest option of all Very easy to handle Rapid prototyping method Flexible Thin | Weak stability Low resolution (> 6 μm) Limited wavelength range (> 350 nm) |