Table 1.
Author, year of publication | Country | Sample size | MLR value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | OR/HR | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
Wang et al 2015[8] | China | 419 | 327 | 0.37 ± 0.23 | 0.16 ± 0.06 | 89.81 (53.18,151.68) | ||
Fayed et al 2018[22] | Egypt | 50 | 50 | 0.46 ± 0.30 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 80 | 90 | |
Ngahane et al 2019[24] | Cameroon | 204 | 204 | 0.39 ± 0.23 | 0.19 ± 0.11 | 67.2 | 83.3 | |
Manna et al 2017[3] | Italy | 31 | 71 | 0.50 ± 0.20 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 91.04 | 93.55 | |
Liana et al 2019[23] | Indonesia | 41 | 60 | 0.97 ± 0.51 | 0.57 ± 0.76 | 95.1 | 70 | |
Rakotosamimanana et al 2015[20] | Madagascar | 85 | 186 | - | - | 4.97 (1.3–18.99) | ||
Rees et al 2020[26] | Tanzania | 98 | 47 | - | - | 68 | 51 | |
Choudhary et al 2019[18] | Kenya | 13 | 67 | 0.48 ± 0.3 | 0.23 ± 0.2 | 77 | 78 | |
Naranbhai et al2014[17] | South Africa* | 12 | 1190 | - | - | 1.22 (1.07–1.4) | ||
Naranbhai et al2014[11] | South Africa | 1862 | - | - | 2.47 (1.39–4.40) | |||
Ginderdeuren et al 2021[19] | South Africa | 51 | 120 | 0.22 ± 0.16 | 0.34 ± 0.27 | 0.78 (0.59, 0.97) | ||
Naranbhai et al2014[12] | South Africa | 1336 | - | 1.23 (1.04-1.45) | ||||
MLR before treatment | MLR after treatment | |||||||
Wang et al 2015[8] | China | 419 | 327 | 0.47 ± 0.21 | 0.22 ± 0.09 | |||
Iqbal et al 2014[21] | Pakistan | 45 | 45 | 0.24 ± 0.14 | 0.19 ± 0.10 | |||
Okeke et al 2020[25] | Nigeria | 60 | 60 | 0.11 ± 0.08 | 0.08 ± 0.06 | |||
Wang et al 2019[9] | China | 151 | 129 | 0.47 ± 0.29 | 0.34 ± 0.5 |
South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda and Zimbabwe.
HR = Hazard ratio, MLR = Monocyte to lymphocyte ratio, OR = Odds ratio.