Table 5.
Variables | Access to an improved latrine |
COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | ||||
Sanitation marketing product users | |||||
Gender | Female | 77 | 7 | 4.9 (2.15, 11.12) | 4.3 (1.69, 10.59) |
Male | 162 | 72 | 1 | 1 | |
Water access | Yes | 174 | 43 | 2.24 (1.32, 3.79) | 3.3 (1.63, 6.57)∗ |
No | 65 | 36 | 1 | 1 | |
Residence | Urban | 127 | 58 | 2.41 (1.39, 4.26) | 2.5 (1.23, 5.19) |
Rural | 112 | 21 | 1 | 1 | |
Supportive supervision | Yes | 161 | 30 | 3.4 (1.99, 5.72) | 2.8 (1.44, 5.49)∗ |
No | 78 | 49 | 1 | 1 | |
Sanitation hardware store | Yes | 139 | 22 | 3.6 (2.07, 6.27) | 4.0 (2.05, 8.13)∗∗ |
No | 100 | 57 | 1 | 1 | |
Knowledge | Good | 190 | 40 | 3.8 (2.20, 6.49) | 2.5 (1.23, 5.04)∗ |
Poor | 49 | 39 | 1 | 1 | |
Attitude | Positive | 181 | 42 | 2.8 (1.62, 4.68) | 2.3 (1.15, 4.53)∗ |
Negative | 58 | 37 | 1 | 1 | |
Sanitation marketing product non-users | |||||
Gender | Female | 59 | 34 | 3.1 (1.86, 5.09) | 7.3 (3.68, 14.39) |
Male | 79 | 140 | 1 | 1 | |
Water access | Yes | 68 | 55 | 2.1 (1.32, 3.34) | 2.4 (1.44, 4.10)∗ |
No | 70 | 119 | 1 | 1 | |
Residence | Urban | 63 | 115 | 2.3 (1.46, 3.67) | 2.8 (1.64, 4.77) |
Rural | 75 | 59 | 1 | 1 | |
Supportive supervision | Yes | 106 | 118 | 1.6 (0.95, 2.61) | 2.1 (1.15, 3.79)∗ |
No | 32 | 56 | 1 | 1 | |
Knowledge | Good | 76 | 68 | 1.9 (1.22, 3.01) | 2.1 (1.29, 3.58)∗ |
Poor | 62 | 106 | 1 | 1 | |
Attitude | Positive | 72 | 65 | 1.6 (1.04, 2.56) | 1.8 (1.06, 2.92)∗ |
Negative | 66 | 109 | 1 | 1 |