Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 27;16:917183. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.917183

TABLE 2.

Statistical outcome of the stimulus estrous × genotype × stress ANOVA of all variables measured during the social interaction (SI) test.

Adults
Old
Estrous Estrous × Genotype Estrous × Stress Estrous × Genotype × Stress Estrous Estrous × Genotype Estrous × Stress Estrous × Genotype × Stress








DF F-value P-value DF F-value P-value DF F-value P-value DF F-value P-value DF F-value P-value DF F-value P-value DF F-value P-value DF F-value P-value
1–27 0.24 0.63 1–27 0.18 0.68 1–27 0.41 0.53 1–27 0.03 0.86 1–22 0.44 0.51 1–22 0.02 0.88 1–22 0.92 0.35 1–22 0.13 0.72
1–30 0.003 0.96 1–30 0.23 0.63 1–30 0.002 0.97 1–30 0.05 0.82 1–25 0.01 0.92 1–25 0.07 0.79 1–25 0.03 0.87 1–25 0.39 0.54
1–30 0.11 0.74 1–30 0.01 0.92 1–30 0.28 0.6 1–30 0.12 0.73 1–25 0.56 0.46 1–25 0.54 0.47 1–25 0.27 0.61 1–25 0.23 0.63
1–30 0.07 0.79 1–30 0.27 0.61 1–30 0.15 0.7 1–30 0.5 0.49 1–25 2.2 0.15 1–25 0.9 0.35 1–25 0.42 0.52 1–25 0.17 0.68
1–30 0.06 0.81 1–30 2.45 0.13 1–30 1.22 0.28 1–30 0.32 0.57 1–25 2.29 0.14 1–25 0.15 0.7 1–25 0.09 0.76 1–25 0.27 0.61
1–30 0.17 0.68 1–30 0.8 0.38 1–30 1.99 1.7 1–30 1.05 0.31 1–25 0.16 0.69 1–25 0.16 0.69 1–25 0.16 0.69 1–25 0.006 0.94
1–30 0.007 0.93 1–30 0.27 0.61 1–30 0.007 0.93 1–30 0.07 0.8 1–25 0.65 0.43 1–25 3.29 0.08 1–25 0.02 0.89 1–25 0.57 0.46
1–30 0.003 0.95 1–30 0.09 0.77 1–30 0.02 0.89 1–30 0.7 0.41 1–25 0.43 0.52 1–25 1.81 0.19 1–25 0.73 0.4 1–25 1.04 0.32
1–30 0.51 0.48 1–30 0.006 0.94 1–30 0.2 0.66 1–30 1.35 0.25 1–25 0.005 0.94 1–25 1.95 0.17 1–25 2.56 0.12 1–25 0.07 0.79
1–30 0.83 0.37 1–30 0.09 0.77 1–30 0.29 0.59 1–30 0.68 0.42 1–25 0.6 0.44 1–25 3.29 0.08 1–25 0.59 0.45 1–25 0.001 0.98
1–30 <0.001 0.99 1–30 0.12 0.73 1–30 1.84 0.18 1–30 0.01 0.91 1–25 0.08 0.78 1–25 0.41 0.52 1–25 0.74 0.4 1–25 0.85 0.37
1–30 0.1 0.75 1–30 1.48 0.23 1–30 0.06 0.81 1–30 1.05 0.31 1–25 0.21 0.65 1–25 1.12 0.3 1–25 1.02 0.32 1–25 0.28 0.6

NMRI adult stimulus females used during the social interaction (SI) test of the Fmr1 offspring were either in estrous or diestrous phase. The allocation of each stimulus female was balanced across experimental groups so that half of each genotype × stress group encountered either a diestrous or estrous female. Different batches of stimulus female were used for testing at the two ages. No significant effect of estrous or of its interactions was found by the 2 × 2 × 2 (estrous × genotype × stress) ANOVA of all social and USV-related parameters. Slight differences in the exact number of mice (provided in the corresponding figures) are due to technical reasons (e.g., loss of behavioral video recordings) or to the exclusion of outliers (using Grubbs’ ESD test adapted for small sample size). Nb, number; Dur, mean duration; USVs, ultrasonic vocalizations.