Abstract
Early chest compressions and rapid defibrillation are important components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). American heart association (AHA) recommends two breaths to be delivered for every 30 compressions for an adult cardiac arrest victim. Patient with an advanced airway like endotracheal tube (ETT) should be given one breath every 6 s without interruptions in chest compression (10 breaths per minute). All of the modern mechanical ventilators have option to generate spontaneous breaths by the patient if the patient has spontaneous respiratory efforts. During CPR, the mechanical ventilator is fallaciously sensing the chest compressions as patient's spontaneous trigger and thereby it delivers higher respiratory rates. Avoiding excessive ventilation is one of the components of high quality CPR as excessive ventilation decreases venous return thereby decreasing the cardiac output and also it affects intra-thoracic pressure thereby adversely affects intra-arterial pressure. As modern ventilators have trigger for spontaneous breaths and they will be erroneously triggered by chest compressions, it would be prudent to use volume marked resuscitation bags or manual breathing devices (manual self-inflating resuscitation bag, Bain's circuit) for delivering breaths which can be synchronised with compression phase of CPR at RR of 10 breaths per min with advanced airway in place. If any patient who is on mechanical ventilation develops cardiac arrest, patient should be disconnected from the mechanical ventilator and should be ventilated manually. Manual ventilation with aforementioned breathing devices should be used in a patient without and with advanced airway devices during CPR.
Keywords: CPR, Advanced airway, Ventilation
1. Manuscript
Early chest compressions and rapid defibrillation are important components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).1 Global resuscitation bodies recommend two breaths to be delivered for every 30 compressions for an adult cardiac arrest victim. Patient with an advanced airway like endotracheal tube (ETT) should be given one breath every 6 s without interruption in chest compression (10 breaths per minute).1 Aufderheide et al had found that hyperventilation (respiratory rate 12 vs. 30) reduced coronary perfusion pressure during CPR in animals.2 When mechanically ventilated patient develops cardiac arrest, there is widespread practice of increasing the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) concentration to 100% and set respiratory rate (RR) at 10. min−1 (as per guideline by global resuscitation bodies). All of the modern mechanical ventilators have provision to sense the spontaneous respiratory efforts of the patient. The ventilator senses the patient's spontaneous respiratory efforts either by flow or pressure trigger variable.3 Upon reaching the set trigger by the patient because of the spontaneous respiratory effort, ventilator will assist the patient's spontaneous respiratory efforts. During CPR, the mechanical ventilator is fallaciously sensing the chest compressions as patient's spontaneous breath trigger and thereby it delivers higher respiratory rates. Avoiding excessive ventilation is one of the components of high quality CPR as excessive ventilation decreases venous return thereby decreasing the cardiac output and also it affects intrathoracic pressure thereby adversely affects intra-arterial pressure.1,3 Ventilation and oxygenation becomes ineffective because of repetitive erroneous triggering of ventilator by chest compressions. The patient might be harmed because of this high RR during CPR due to decreased cardiac output which is against the recommendation for RR as 10. min−1 when patient has advanced airway in place. Ahn et al had compared the effectiveness of ventilation with manual self-inflating resuscitator and mechanical ventilator in manikin while performing CPR.4 Authors kept tidal volume (VT) of 600 ml, inspiratory time of 1.2 s, RR of 10. min−1 and trigger was increased to maximum to avoid inadvertent delivery of additional breaths thereby delivered RR can be as set RR. Volume marked resuscitation bag was used in this study. The mean delivered VT with resuscitation bag was 591.50 ml [with peak airway pressure (Paw) of 53.20 cmH2O] and it was 529.50 ml (Paw of 46.30 cmH2O) with mechanical ventilator. Delivered RR was not monitored by authors. This study had revealed that the appropriate delivery of VT by resuscitation bag itself. The clinical endpoint for ventilation during CPR is visible chest rise which can be achieved manually with manual self-inflating resuscitation bag or by Bain's circuit. Weiss et al had compared the automatic transport ventilator (ATV) vs bag valve for ventilation in 21 patients requiring CPR.5 Though authors concluded that the emergency medicine technicians could perform other tasks when ATV was used, the delivered RR was higher in ATV group when compared with bag valve group.
Hence, there should be emphasis on taking the ventilation manually either by manual self-inflatable resuscitator (Ambu bag) or with breathing circuits (Bain's Circuit) when mechnaically ventilated patient develops cardiac arrest instead of continuing with mechanical ventilator.
Author's contributions
Muthapillai Senthilnathan: Term, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing-Original draft, Writing-Review & Editing; Ramya Ravi: Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing-Original draft, Writing-Review & Editing; Srinivasan Suganya: Investigation, Resources, Writing-Original draft, Writing-Review & Editing; Ranjith Kumar Sivakumar: Writing-Original draft, Writing-Review & Editing.
Funding source
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Institute ethics committee approval
Not applicable.
Declaration of competing interest
None.
Acknowledgement
None.
References
- 1.Link M.S., Berkow L.C., Kudenchuk P.J., et al. Part 7: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132:S444–S464. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aufderheide T.P., Sigurdsson G., Pirrallo R.G., et al. Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2004;109:1960. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000126594.79136.61. –5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pilbeam’s Mechanical Ventilation - 6th Edition [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/pilbeams-mechanical-ventilation/cairo/978-0-323-32009-2.
- 4.Ahn H.J., Kim K.D., Jeong W.J., Lee J.W., Yoo I.S., Ryu S. The adequacy of a conventional mechanical ventilator as a ventilation method during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a manikin study. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2015;30:89–94. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weiss S.J., Ernst A.A., Jones R., et al. Automatic transport ventilator versus bag valve in the EMS setting: a prospective, randomized trial. South Med J. 2005;98:970–976. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000182177.01436.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]