Table 2.
Summary of the relative performance of each model in the percent of testing subjects classified correctly indicated by mean (standard deviation)—max
| Overall | Healthy | GoF | LoF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision tree | ||||
| Accuracy | 62.05 (1.54)–65.38 | 60.0 (6.92)–69.23 | 70.77 (8.8)–80.77 | 55.38 (9.3)–73.08 |
| True Positive Rate | 0.6 (0.07)–0.69 | 0.71 (0.09)–0.81 | 0.56 (0.09)–0.73 | |
| False Positive Rate | 0.23 (0.05)–0.31 | 0.17 (0.05)–0.25 | 0.17 (0.05)–0.25 | |
| F1 | 0.58 (0.04)–0.64 | 0.69 (0.04)–0.76 | 0.58 (0.06)–0.7 | |
| Gaussian Naive Bayes | ||||
| Accuracy | 65.98 (2.07)–70.51 | 83.19 (6.1)–100.0 | 68.88 (5.65)–80.77 | 45.86 (6.85)–61.54 |
| True Positive Rate | 0.83 (0.06)–1.0 | 0.69 (0.06)–0.81 | 0.46 (0.07)–0.62 | |
| False Positive Rate | 0.33 (0.06)–0.48 | 0.07 (0.04)–0.17 | 0.11 (0.04)–0.23 | |
| F1 | 0.67 (0.03)–0.75 | 0.75 (0.04)–0.83 | 0.55 (0.05)–0.62 | |
| Neural network | ||||
| Accuracy | 53.2 (1.5)–57.69 | 53.85 (7.45)–65.38 | 61.78 (7.38)–73.08 | 43.99 (9.42)–57.69 |
| True Positive Rate | 0.54 (0.08)–0.65 | 0.62 (0.07)–0.73 | 0.44 (0.09)–0.58 | |
| False Positive Rate | 0.24 (0.05)–0.33 | 0.19 (0.06)–0.37 | 0.27 (0.06)–0.37 | |
| F1 | 0.53 (0.04)–0.59 | 0.62 (0.04)–0.67 | 0.44 (0.06)–0.53 | |
| Support vector machine | ||||
| Accuracy | 60.34 (2.66)–65.38 | 72.46 (10.18)–92.31 | 60.18 (7.3)–76.92 | 48.37 (12.3)–73.08 |
| True Positive Rate | 0.72 (0.1)–0.92 | 0.6 (0.07)–0.77 | 0.48 (0.12)–0.73 | |
| False Positive Rate | 0.31 (0.09)–0.58 | 0.11 (0.04)–0.19 | 0.18 (0.07)–0.33 | |
| F1 | 0.62 (0.04)–0.71 | 0.66 (0.06)–0.77 | 0.52 (0.08)–0.67 | |
| Gradient boosting decision tree | ||||
| Accuracy | 62.55 (1.23)–66.67 | 59.16 (7.89)–76.92 | 66.32 (6.59)–80.77 | 62.15 (7.28)–76.92 |
| True Positive Rate | 0.59 (0.08)–0.77 | 0.66 (0.06)–0.81 | 0.62 (0.07)–0.77 | |
| False Positive Rate | 0.22 (0.05)–0.35 | 0.14 (0.04)–0.25 | 0.2 (0.05)–0.31 | |
| F1 | 0.58 (0.04)–0.68 | 0.68 (0.04)–0.79 | 0.61 (0.05)–0.73 | |