Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aerosol Sci. 2022 Mar 25;163:105992. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.105992

Table 1.

Comparison of main features of passive and active bioaerosol samplers.

Feature Passive Samplers Active Samplers
Known flow rate No (work is ongoing to establish an equivalent flowrate) Yes
Known sample volume No Yes
Airborne concentration determination Estimate only Yes
Sampling duration Hours to weeks Minutes to weeks
Primary collection mechanisms Gravitational settling, electrostatic forces, diffusion, turbulent dispersion, opportunity-based sampling Filtration, impaction, impingement, cyclonic forces, electrostatic forces
Power requirements None Pump and electrostatic components, if ESP is used
Weight Lightweight and portable Heavier due to addition of sampling media (e.g., agar) and a pump
Operator attention requirements Deployment and retrieval Deployment and retrieval, flowrate determination and maintenance, media replenishment for liquidbased samplers, possible replacement of collection media
Cost Sampler Sampler, pump, power supply