Table 3.
Ratio of detection (%) based on number of regions that met Bonferroni-corrected significance.
LMEINT | LMEINT+SLP | ComBat | ComBat-GAM | |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Effect of Age | ||||
LME INT | - | 77.9 | 100 | 100 |
LME INT+SLP | 100 | - | 100 | 100 |
ComBat | 98.6 | 76.9 | - | 100 |
ComBat-GAM | 98.6 | 76.9 | 100 | - |
Effect of Diagnosis | ||||
LME INT | - | 50 | 100 | 50 |
LME INT+SLP | 50 | - | 50 | 100 |
ComBat | 40 | 20 | - | 80 |
ComBat-GAM | 3.2 | 6.5 | 12.9 | - |
Age by Diagnosis Interaction | ||||
LME INT | - | NA | NA | NA |
LME INT+SLP | NA | - | NA | NA |
ComBat | NA | NA | - | NA |
ComBat-GAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Effect of Sex | ||||
LME INT | - | 100 | 100 | 100 |
LME INT+SLP | 89.7 | - | 100 | 93.1 |
ComBat | 60.5 | 67.4 | - | 93 |
ComBat-GAM | 60.5 | 62.8 | 93 | - |
Sex by Diagnosis Interaction | ||||
LME INT | - | NA | NA | NA |
LME INT+SLP | NA | - | NA | NA |
ComBat | NA | NA | - | NA |
ComBat-GAM | NA | NA | NA | - |
Note: The ratio of detection is defined as the proportion of cortical regions showing statistical significance that were identified by the methods in rows were also detected by the methods in columns. Higher ratio of detection means that the method in columns was as effective as the method in rows at detecting significance. NA indicates not available because no significant finding was detected by the method in rows.