Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 30;261:119509. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119509

Table 3.

Ratio of detection (%) based on number of regions that met Bonferroni-corrected significance.

LMEINT LMEINT+SLP ComBat ComBat-GAM

Effect of Age
LME INT - 77.9 100 100
LME INT+SLP 100 - 100 100
ComBat 98.6 76.9 - 100
ComBat-GAM 98.6 76.9 100 -
Effect of Diagnosis
LME INT - 50 100 50
LME INT+SLP 50 - 50 100
ComBat 40 20 - 80
ComBat-GAM 3.2 6.5 12.9 -
Age by Diagnosis Interaction
LME INT - NA NA NA
LME INT+SLP NA - NA NA
ComBat NA NA - NA
ComBat-GAM 0 0 0 -
Effect of Sex
LME INT - 100 100 100
LME INT+SLP 89.7 - 100 93.1
ComBat 60.5 67.4 - 93
ComBat-GAM 60.5 62.8 93 -
Sex by Diagnosis Interaction
LME INT - NA NA NA
LME INT+SLP NA - NA NA
ComBat NA NA - NA
ComBat-GAM NA NA NA -

Note: The ratio of detection is defined as the proportion of cortical regions showing statistical significance that were identified by the methods in rows were also detected by the methods in columns. Higher ratio of detection means that the method in columns was as effective as the method in rows at detecting significance. NA indicates not available because no significant finding was detected by the method in rows.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure