Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;17:100484. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100484

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Characterization of t-ML. A,B) Size and zeta potential of t-ML; C) TEM images of OA@Fe3O4 (scale bar ​= ​20 ​nm), ML (scale bar ​= ​50 ​nm), t-ML (scale bar ​= ​100 ​nm); D) SDS-PAGE protein analysis of prostate cancer cells (1), prostate cancer cell membranes (2), and t-ML (3); E) the stability test results of t-ML in PBS or ultrapure water in 42 days (n ​= ​3, mean ​± ​SD); F) Results of agarose gel electrophoresis (pEGFP: 1 ​μg); G) statistical analysis of the gene transfection assay (n ​= ​3, mean ​± ​SD, multiple t-test, ∗∗∗P ​< ​0.001); H) gene transfection fluorescence images of t-ML at different N/P ratios (bars: 50 ​μm); I) CCK-8 assay of the toxicity of Lipo 2000, en-PEI, ML and t-ML (n ​= ​3, mean ​± ​SD, one-way ANOVA, ∗P ​< ​0.05).