Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 12;44(10):1329–1338. doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-03016-4

Table 3.

Table gathers the R values obtained in the correlation analysis between categories

Category Age [mm] TAT length [mm] TAT maximal diameter [mm] TAT ostial area [mm] Distance from the coracoid process to the clavicle [mm] Distance from the coracoid process to the second rib [mm] Distance from the clavicle to the second rib [mm] Distance from the coracoid process to the TAT [mm] Distance from the clavicle to the TAT [mm] Distance from the second rib to the TAT [mm]
Age [mm] 1.00 0.09 −0.04 −0.04 −0.11 −0.03 0.01 −0.32 −0.16 0.28
TAT length [mm] 0.09 1.00 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.27 0.31 0.18 −0.01 0.37
TAT maximal diameter [mm] −0.04 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.05 0.16
TAT ostial area [mm] −0.04 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.05 0.16
Distance from the coracoid process to the clavicle [mm] −0.11 0.13 0.26 0.26 1.00 0.39 0.27 0.54 0.61 −0.05
Distance from the coracoid process to the second rib [mm] −0.03 0.27 0.18 0.18 0.39 1.00 0.62 0.77 0.21 0.62
Distance from the clavicle to the second rib [mm] 0.01 0.31 0.18 0.18 0.27 0.62 1.00 0.29 0.55 0.79
Distance from the coracoid process to the TAT [mm] −0.32 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.54 0.77 0.29 1.00 0.12 0.20
Distance from the clavicle to the TAT [mm] −0.16 −0.01 0.05 0.05 0.61 0.21 0.55 0.12 1.00 0.12
Distance from the second rib to the TAT [mm] 0.28 0.37 0.16 0.16 −0.05 0.62 0.79 0.20 0.12 1.00

Italics values are those in which the p value was smaller than 0.05