Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pathol. 2022 Oct 14;258(4):325–338. doi: 10.1002/path.6006

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of CCOC protein clusters and other clinicopathological parameters.

# of events/n comparison Hazard Ratio (95% CI) LRT p-value

Overall survival 34 / 80
Cluster (reference: Metabolic) F,C,N* 3.02 (1.44–6.69)F 0.0027
Cluster (reference: Coagulative) M,F,N* 0.46 (0.22–0.96)F 0.0364
Age and diagnosis 1.00 (0.96–1.04)F 0.8952
Stage (reference: Stage I) II-IV 7.98 (3.22–23.55)F 0
Residual disease (reference: non-optimal) optimal 0.29 (0.14–0.61)F 0.0015
ARID1A (IHC) (reference: 0) 1/2 1.03 (0.49–2.26)F 0.8882
Adjuvant treatment (reference: no) yes 0.06 (0.01–0.39)F 0.013

Progression-free survival 37 / 78
Cluster (reference: Metabolic) F,C,N* 3.02 (1.46–6.65)F 0.002
Cluster (reference: Coagulative) M,F,N* 0.44 (0.21–0.92)F 0.0274
Age and diagnosis 0.98 (0.94–1.02)F 0.3481
Stage (reference: Stage I) II-IV 6.10 (2.79–14.80)F 0
Residual disease (reference: non-optimal) optimal 0.24 (0.12–0.50)F 0.0002
ARID1A (IHC) (reference: 0) 1/2* 1.07 (0.54–2.15)F 0.8024
Adjuvant treatment (reference: no) yes 0.31 (0.06–3.09)F 0.4782
F

indicates that the Firth’s penalized maximum likelihood bias reduction method was used to estimate the hazard ratio.

*

Proteomic Cluster M: Metabolic active cluster; F: Fibrotic cluster; C: Coagulative cluster; N: Necrotic cluster