Table 2.
Treatment adherence
| Total | na | Do-module | na | Think-module | na | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Diaries completed | ||||||
| Total sample | 66.0 ± 29.0 | 110 | 70.5 ± 24.9 | 55 | 61.5 ± 32.1 | 55 |
| Completers | 76.7 ± 18.6 | 110 | 76.9 ± 18.4 | 48 | 76.4 ± 19.2 | 42 |
| Dropouts | 18.0 ± 14.8 | 110 | 26.6 ± 19.1 | 7 | 13.4 ± 9.9 | 13 |
| Compliance >75% | 49% | 110 | 56% | 55 | 42% | 55 |
| Diary duration, sec | 119 [88;167] | 10 314 | 115 [87;162] | 5505 | 124 [90;173] | 4809 |
| Feedback reports | ||||||
| Read week 1 | 94% | 90 | 91% | 47 | 100% | 43 |
| Read week 2 | 92% | 90 | 87% | 47 | 98% | 43 |
| Read week 3 | 71% | 90 | 70% | 47 | 72% | 43 |
| Read week 4 | 78% | 90 | 77% | 47 | 79% | 43 |
| Intention to discuss in therapy (post-EMA) | 92% | 90 | 94% | 47 | 91% | 43 |
| Discussed in therapy (FU2)b | 57% | 60 | 58% | 31 | 55% | 29 |
Note. Numbers represent percentage, mean ± standard deviation, or median [25th;75th percentile]. FU2 = the follow-up assessment 2 months after the post-EMA assessment.
a
The sample size differs per variable due to missing data or different measurement levels (i.e. diary duration is based on the number of valid measurements rather than the number of participants).
b
Reasons why participants did not discuss the feedback report with their therapist were: treatment did not start yet (n = 8), report not useful (n = 5), did not know how to discuss it (n = 4), did not finish the intervention (n = 2), or other (n = 7, e.g. forgotten, never came up, did not get around to it yet).