Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 28;13:1006413. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1006413

Table 2.

Seasonal change in dry-mass based leaf N content (Nmass, mg g-1) and resorption efficiency (%) in leaves of fullmoon maple seedlings grown under different light conditions.

Date Open Shade
H0 L0 LH1 LH2 LH3 F-statistics
Aug 2 26.1 ± 0.6 b 30.6 ± 0.9 a 17.0** (F1,6)
Aug 20 26.8 ± 0.4 b 29.9 ± 1.2 a 6.01* (F1,6)
Sep 8 25.5 ± 0.8 b 32.1 ± 1.4 a 17.0** (F1,6)
Sep 29 20.9 ± 0.4 b 30.8 ± 1.1 a 76.0*** (F1,6)
Oct 6 19.7 ± 0.8 b 30.5 ± 1.3 a 27.7 ± 0.7 a 32.5*** (F2,8)
Oct 13 17.6 ± 1.7 b 27.2 ± 1.9 a 24.2 ± 0.3 ab 26.7 ± 0.5 a 6.69** (F3,11)
Oct 19 18.7 ± 2.1 23.2 ± 2.3 20.6 ± 1.0 21.6 ± 0.6 19.5 ± 1.7 0.97ns (F4,17)
Oct 25 12.6 ± 2.3 ab 16.0 ± 0.9 a 10.7 ± 0.4 b 15.3 ± 1.2 ab 11.1 ± 0.8 b 4.58ns (F4,15)
Shed leaves 10.0 ± 1.0 b 11.1 ± 0.4 b 12.0 ± 0.6 b 14.6 ± 0.6 a 10.1 ± 0.2 b 12.0*** (F4,70)
Resorption efficiency (%) 57.5 ± 8.4a 64.0 ± 1.3a 65.9 ± 1.9 a 52.8 ± 1.9 b 67.1 ± 0.8 a 9.48*** (F4,70)

H0: open condition, L0: shade condition (relative irradiance of ≈ 13% of open condition) throughout the experimental period, LH1: transfer from shade to open on Oct 5, LH2: transfer from shade to open on Oct 12, and LH3: transfer from shade to open on Oct 18. Values are means ± se; n= 3 to 6 for attached leaves, sampled from Aug 2 to Oct 25, and n = 9 to 22 for shed leaves collected from Oct 25 to Nov 1. * denotes significant effect at P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, and *** P ≤ 0.001. ns indicates no significant effect. Different letters indicate significant differences among means of the light treatments on the same date at P < 0.05.