Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2022 Jan 13;24(3):916–920. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c04267

Table 1.

Optimization of the Reaction and Its Conditions a

graphic file with name nihms-1848834-t0007.jpg
entry base (equiv) solvent (mL) [photocatalyst] yield (%)b
1 Et3N (2.0) CH3CN (1.0) 4CzIPN 24
2 Et3N (2.0) DMSO (1.0) 4CzIPN 22
3 Et3N (2.0) 1,4-dioxane (1.0) 4CzIPN 26
4 Et3N (2.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 46
5 DIPEA (2.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 34
6 DABCO (2.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 0
7 Et3N (3.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 48
8 Et3N (5.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 50
9c Et3N (5.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 55
10d Et3N (5.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 62 (60)e
11f Et3N (5.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 38
12 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 0
13g Et3N (5.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) 4CzIPN 0
14 Et3N (5.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) eosin Y 38
15 Et3N (5.0) 1,4-dioxane (0.4) Ir(dtbbpy) 58
a

Optimal reaction conditions are as follows: 1 (2.0 mmol, 10 equiv), 2a (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), base (1.0 mmol, 5 equiv), 1,4-dioxane (0.5 mL), 4CzIPN (5 mol %), 440 nm LED (40 W), room temperature (temperature around reaction flask was 35 °C due to heating caused by the LED lamp), reaction flask capped under argon, 24 h.

b

1H NMR yields using dibromomethane as internal standard.

c

1a (5 equiv) was used instead of 2 equiv.

d

1a (10 equiv) was used instead of 2 equiv.

e

Isolated yield.

f

A 427 nm LED (40W) was used instead of a 440 nm LED.

g

The reaction was performed in the dark.