Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 26;4(6):fcac272. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac272

Table 3.

Comparison of A/T groups on cortical thickness, vascular risk and APOE status

Variable A−/T− A−/T+ A+/T− A+/T+ Test statistic P-value
EC thickness, mean (SD) 3.58 (0.4) 3.37 (0.6)a 3.58 (0.3) 3.24 (0.5)a F = 12.6 <0.001
ITG thickness, mean (SD) 2.86 (0.1) 2.83 (0.2) 2.87 (0.1) 2.76 (0.2)a F = 5.6 <0.001
Precuneus thickness, mean (SD) 2.34 (0.1) 2.31 (0.1) 2.30 (0.2) 2.23 (0.2)a F = 5.3 0.001
SFG thickness, mean (SD) 2.56 (0.1) 2.52 (0.1) 2.51 (0.2) 2.51 (0.1) F = 1.2 0.31
Pulse pressure, mean (SD) 2.00 (0.1) 2.00 (0.1) 2.01 (0.1) 2.01 (0.1) F = 0.8 0.45
HIS score % high risk 45.2% 54.2% 50.0% 50.7% F = 2.2 0.54
Global WMH, mean (SD) 5.39 (9.1) 6.19 (7.9) 11.86 (16.7) 10.3 (17.1) χ2 = 0.6 0.59
APOE ε4 status, % ε4 positive 23.3% 18.6% 51.0%b 64.8%c χ2 = 116.2 <0.001

EC, entorhinal cortex; HIS, Hachinski ischaemic scale; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; SD, standard deviation; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; WMH, white matter hyperintensities.

Note that the values reported here do not reflect the transformed and residualized values used in model estimates.

a

Significantly different from the A−/T− and A+/T− groups.

b

Significantly different from the A−/T− and A−/T + groups.

c

Significantly different from all other groups.