Table 3.
Predicted probabilities of psychosocial working conditions by gender, n = 73,296
| 2015 Predicted Probability (95% CI) |
2020 Predicted Probability (95% CI) |
AME 2020 vs. 2015 (p value) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Working in leisure time | |||
| Female | 22.3 (20.1–24.6) | 37.3 (34.5–38.9) | 15.0 (p < 0.001) |
| Male | 27.6 (25.7–29.5) | 39.5 (37.5–41.5) | 11.9 (p < 0.001) |
| AME Female vs. Male (p value) | −5.3 (p < 0.001) | −2.2 (p = 0.004) | 3.1 (p = 0.007) |
| Lack of psychological detachment | |||
| Female | 15.1 (12.8–17.5) | 27.2 (24.0–30.3) | 12.1 (p < 0.001) |
| Male | 15.0 (12.6–17.5) | 25.6 (21.9–29.3) | 10.6 (p < 0.001) |
| AME Female vs. Male (p-value) | 0.1 (p = 0.753) | 1.6 (p = 0.050) | 1.5 (p = 0.046) |
| Work-life conflict | |||
| Female | 17.6 (15.6–19.6) | 25.8 (24.0–27.6) | 8.2 (p < 0.001) |
| Male | 16.0 (14.4–17.7) | 20.7 (18.7–22.8) | 4.7 (p < 0.001) |
| AME Female vs. Male (p-value) | 1.6 (p = 0.005) | 5.1 (p < 0.001) | 3.5 (p < 0.001) |
Estimates are based on multilevel regressions on the association between covariates and psychosocial working conditions with three levels (level 1: individual, level 2: country-years, level 3: country), adjusted for age, education and marital/partner status
95% CI 95% confidence interval, AME average marginal effects